Hannah Kosow

859 total citations
20 papers, 506 citations indexed

About

Hannah Kosow is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Management Science and Operations Research and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Hannah Kosow has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 506 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 7 papers in Management Science and Operations Research and 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Hannah Kosow's work include Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (10 papers), Complex Systems and Decision Making (5 papers) and Water resources management and optimization (3 papers). Hannah Kosow is often cited by papers focused on Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (10 papers), Complex Systems and Decision Making (5 papers) and Water resources management and optimization (3 papers). Hannah Kosow collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Australia and United Kingdom. Hannah Kosow's co-authors include Wolfgang Weimer-Jehle, Sigrid Prehofer, Stefan Vögele, Witold‐Roger Poganietz, Wolfgang Hauser, Sabrina Kirschke, Mandy Scheermesser, Tobias Naegler, Thomas Pregger and Asarnusch Rashid and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Science of The Total Environment and Energy.

In The Last Decade

Hannah Kosow

17 papers receiving 470 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Hannah Kosow Germany 12 182 116 88 66 66 20 506
Ulrik Jørgensen Denmark 13 199 1.1× 177 1.5× 104 1.2× 69 1.0× 58 0.9× 58 718
Carol Atkinson‐Palombo United States 16 202 1.1× 175 1.5× 199 2.3× 55 0.8× 44 0.7× 47 1.0k
Darren Swanson Canada 7 152 0.8× 99 0.9× 91 1.0× 75 1.1× 20 0.3× 11 594
Karen Anderton United Kingdom 7 304 1.7× 182 1.6× 83 0.9× 53 0.8× 37 0.6× 15 743
Wolfgang Weimer-Jehle Germany 12 256 1.4× 124 1.1× 142 1.6× 114 1.7× 149 2.3× 32 612
Johan Nordensvärd United Kingdom 15 100 0.5× 304 2.6× 151 1.7× 25 0.4× 41 0.6× 42 737
Pia‐Johanna Schweizer Germany 15 272 1.5× 360 3.1× 103 1.2× 71 1.1× 25 0.4× 25 788
Marleen van de Kerkhof Netherlands 10 244 1.3× 162 1.4× 45 0.5× 73 1.1× 29 0.4× 12 502
Pourya Salehi Germany 5 170 0.9× 179 1.5× 172 2.0× 26 0.4× 22 0.3× 6 620
Susanne Hanger-Kopp Austria 13 269 1.5× 270 2.3× 99 1.1× 34 0.5× 70 1.1× 33 635

Countries citing papers authored by Hannah Kosow

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hannah Kosow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hannah Kosow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hannah Kosow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hannah Kosow

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hannah Kosow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hannah Kosow. The network helps show where Hannah Kosow may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hannah Kosow

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hannah Kosow. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hannah Kosow based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hannah Kosow. Hannah Kosow is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kirschke, Sabrina & Hannah Kosow. (2025). Structuring wicked problems in science communication. Review of Policy Research. 42(5). 1277–1302. 1 indexed citations
2.
3.
Kosow, Hannah & Sandra Wassermann. (2023). Conflicts in the inter-municipal management of commercial areas – a case study using cognitive-affective mapping. European Planning Studies. 32(6). 1273–1294.
4.
Kosow, Hannah, et al.. (2022). Designing synergetic and sustainable policy mixes - a methodology to address conflictive environmental issues. Environmental Science & Policy. 130. 36–46. 27 indexed citations
5.
Kosow, Hannah, Sandra Wassermann, Stephan Bartke, et al.. (2022). Addressing Goal Conflicts: New Policy Mixes for Commercial Land Use Management. Land. 11(6). 795–795. 9 indexed citations
6.
Kosow, Hannah, Sabrina Kirschke, Dietrich Borchardt, et al.. (2022). Scenarios of water extremes: Framing ways forward for wicked problems. Hydrological Processes. 36(2). 8 indexed citations
7.
Prehofer, Sigrid, Hannah Kosow, Tobias Naegler, et al.. (2021). Linking qualitative scenarios with quantitative energy models: knowledge integration in different methodological designs. Energy Sustainability and Society. 11(1). 17 indexed citations
8.
Kirschke, Sabrina & Hannah Kosow. (2021). Designing policy mixes for emerging wicked problems. The case of pharmaceutical residues in freshwaters. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning. 24(5). 486–497. 18 indexed citations
9.
Dreyer, Marion, et al.. (2021). Public engagement with research: Citizens’ views on motivations, barriers and support. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 5(2). 6 indexed citations
10.
Elsawah, Sondoss, Serena H. Hamilton, Anthony J. Jakeman, et al.. (2020). Scenario processes for socio-environmental systems analysis of futures: A review of recent efforts and a salient research agenda for supporting decision making. The Science of The Total Environment. 729. 138393–138393. 92 indexed citations
11.
Weimer-Jehle, Wolfgang, Stefan Vögele, Wolfgang Hauser, et al.. (2020). Socio-technical energy scenarios: state-of-the-art and CIB-based approaches. Climatic Change. 162(4). 1723–1741. 37 indexed citations
12.
Minke, Ralf, et al.. (2019). Entwicklung von Trinkwasser- und Abwasserkonzepten in der Metropolregion Lima/Peru. Wasser und Abfall. 21(7-8). 46–52. 1 indexed citations
13.
Weimer-Jehle, Wolfgang, Jens Buchgeister, Wolfgang Hauser, et al.. (2016). Context scenarios and their usage for the construction of socio-technical energy scenarios. Energy. 111. 956–970. 57 indexed citations
14.
Kosow, Hannah, et al.. (2016). Das Konzept der Deutungsmacht. Ein Beitrag zur gegenwärtigen Machtdebatte in der Politischen Theorie?. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft. 36(1). 39–47.
15.
Kosow, Hannah. (2015). New outlooks in traceability and consistency of integrated scenarios. European Journal of Futures Research. 3(1). 19 indexed citations
16.
Orwat, Carsten, et al.. (2010). Adopting Pervasive Computing for Routine Use in Healthcare. IEEE Pervasive Computing. 9(2). 64–71. 22 indexed citations
17.
Kosow, Hannah, et al.. (2008). Methods of Future and Scenario Analysis: Overview, Assessment, and Selection Criteria. Econstor (Econstor). 39. 133. 144 indexed citations
18.
Scheermesser, Mandy, et al.. (2008). User Acceptance of Pervasive Computing in Healthcare: Main Findings of two Case Studies. Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften digital collection (Zurich University of Applied Sciences). 11 indexed citations
19.
Kosow, Hannah, et al.. (2008). Methoden der Zukunfts- und Szenarioanalyse Überblick, Bewertung und Auswahlkriterien. 20 indexed citations
20.
Scheermesser, Mandy, et al.. (2008). User acceptance of pervasive computing in healthcare: Main findings of two case studies. 205–213. 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026