Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The roads ahead: Narratives for shared socioeconomic pathways describing world futures in the 21st century
20152.1k citationsBrian C. O’Neill, Elmar Kriegler et al.profile →
Achievements and needs for the climate change scenario framework
2020366 citationsBrian C. O’Neill, Timothy R. Carter et al.Nature Climate Changeprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Eric Kemp‐Benedict
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Eric Kemp‐Benedict's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eric Kemp‐Benedict with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eric Kemp‐Benedict more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Eric Kemp‐Benedict
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eric Kemp‐Benedict. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eric Kemp‐Benedict. The network helps show where Eric Kemp‐Benedict may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eric Kemp‐Benedict
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eric Kemp‐Benedict.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eric Kemp‐Benedict based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Eric Kemp‐Benedict. Eric Kemp‐Benedict is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
O’Neill, Brian C., Timothy R. Carter, Kristie L. Ebi, et al.. (2020). Achievements and needs for the climate change scenario framework. Nature Climate Change. 10(12). 1074–1084.366 indexed citations breakdown →
Kemp‐Benedict, Eric. (2015). New ways to slice the pie: Span of control and wage and salary distribution within firms. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich).1 indexed citations
11.
Kemp‐Benedict, Eric. (2014). A Kaleckian Model with Intermediate Goods. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich).1 indexed citations
Kemp‐Benedict, Eric. (2014). Shifting to a Green Economy: Lock-in, Path Dependence, and Policy Options. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich).9 indexed citations
14.
Huber‐Lee, Annette, et al.. (2013). The Water, Energy and Food Nexus: Finding the Balance in Infrastructure Investment. AGUFM. 2013.1 indexed citations
15.
Lazarus, Michael, Eric Kemp‐Benedict, Peter Erickson, & Harro van Asselt. (2013). International Trade and Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Could Shifting the Location of Production Bring GHG benefits?.4 indexed citations
Kirby, Mac, et al.. (2009). CPWF Project Report.3 indexed citations
19.
Kirby, M., et al.. (2009). Mekong Basin Focal Project: Final Report.1 indexed citations
20.
Raskin, Paul & Eric Kemp‐Benedict. (2004). Global environment outlook scenario framework : background paper for UNEP's third global environment outlook report (GEO-3).25 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.