Eric Kemp‐Benedict

6.4k total citations · 2 hit papers
78 papers, 3.6k citations indexed

About

Eric Kemp‐Benedict is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Eric Kemp‐Benedict has authored 78 papers receiving a total of 3.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 40 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 20 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 14 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Eric Kemp‐Benedict's work include Climate Change Policy and Economics (25 papers), Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy (11 papers) and Global Energy and Sustainability Research (11 papers). Eric Kemp‐Benedict is often cited by papers focused on Climate Change Policy and Economics (25 papers), Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy (11 papers) and Global Energy and Sustainability Research (11 papers). Eric Kemp‐Benedict collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Sweden. Eric Kemp‐Benedict's co-authors include Kasper Kok, Brian C. O’Neill, Kristie L. Ebi, Elmar Kriegler, Keywan Riahi, Bas van Ruijven, Detlef P. van Vuuren, Dale S. Rothman, Joern Birkmann and William Solecki and has published in prestigious journals such as The Science of The Total Environment, Nature Climate Change and Ecological Economics.

In The Last Decade

Eric Kemp‐Benedict

72 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Hit Papers

The roads ahead: Narratives for shared socioeconomic path... 2015 2026 2018 2022 2015 2020 500 1000 1.5k 2.0k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Eric Kemp‐Benedict United States 19 1.5k 863 646 576 448 78 3.6k
Dale S. Rothman United States 24 2.2k 1.5× 1.2k 1.3× 407 0.6× 678 1.2× 779 1.7× 49 5.0k
Jonathan Doelman Netherlands 30 1.8k 1.2× 996 1.2× 491 0.8× 1.0k 1.8× 278 0.6× 61 4.9k
Patrice Dumas France 21 848 0.6× 615 0.7× 339 0.5× 415 0.7× 365 0.8× 60 4.1k
Katrin Rehdanz Germany 36 1.4k 1.0× 1.4k 1.6× 481 0.7× 485 0.8× 910 2.0× 106 5.0k
Paul Lucas Netherlands 33 2.3k 1.5× 1.7k 2.0× 636 1.0× 1.3k 2.2× 442 1.0× 67 5.0k
Zhihui Li China 32 2.0k 1.4× 1.1k 1.2× 484 0.7× 698 1.2× 209 0.5× 134 3.9k
Zhenci Xu China 31 1.3k 0.9× 958 1.1× 846 1.3× 1.0k 1.7× 313 0.7× 90 4.1k
Rob Swart Netherlands 35 2.7k 1.9× 1.0k 1.2× 306 0.5× 595 1.0× 1.3k 2.9× 112 5.0k
Tomoko Hasegawa Japan 40 1.7k 1.2× 1.7k 2.0× 438 0.7× 1.3k 2.2× 322 0.7× 136 5.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Eric Kemp‐Benedict

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eric Kemp‐Benedict's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eric Kemp‐Benedict with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eric Kemp‐Benedict more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eric Kemp‐Benedict

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eric Kemp‐Benedict. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eric Kemp‐Benedict. The network helps show where Eric Kemp‐Benedict may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eric Kemp‐Benedict

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eric Kemp‐Benedict. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eric Kemp‐Benedict based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eric Kemp‐Benedict. Eric Kemp‐Benedict is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Carlsen, Henrik, Nina Weitz, Kristina Petrova, & Eric Kemp‐Benedict. (2024). A sustainable trajectory for the 2030 Agenda: Targeting historical lock‐ins to accelerate progress on all SDGs. Sustainable Development. 32(5). 4738–4747. 3 indexed citations
2.
Kemp‐Benedict, Eric. (2024). Cost share-induced technological change: An analytical classical-evolutionary model. Journal of Evolutionary Economics. 34(3). 515–567. 1 indexed citations
3.
Campiglio, Emanuele, et al.. (2021). Capital stranding cascades: The impact of decarbonisation on productive asset utilisation. Energy Economics. 103. 105581–105581. 56 indexed citations
4.
Elsawah, Sondoss, Serena H. Hamilton, Anthony J. Jakeman, et al.. (2020). Scenario processes for socio-environmental systems analysis of futures: A review of recent efforts and a salient research agenda for supporting decision making. The Science of The Total Environment. 729. 138393–138393. 92 indexed citations
5.
O’Neill, Brian C., Timothy R. Carter, Kristie L. Ebi, et al.. (2020). Achievements and needs for the climate change scenario framework. Nature Climate Change. 10(12). 1074–1084. 366 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Kemp‐Benedict, Eric, et al.. (2020). A Climate-Economy Policy Model for Barbados. Economies. 8(1). 16–16. 2 indexed citations
7.
Kemp‐Benedict, Eric, et al.. (2018). Downshifting in the Fast Lane: A Post-Keynesian Model of a Consumer-Led Transition. Economies. 6(1). 3–3. 2 indexed citations
8.
Kemp‐Benedict, Eric. (2018). Investing in a Green Transition. Ecological Economics. 153. 218–236. 42 indexed citations
9.
Kemp‐Benedict, Eric. (2017). Biased technological change and Kaldor’s stylized facts. MPRA Paper. 1 indexed citations
10.
Kemp‐Benedict, Eric. (2015). New ways to slice the pie: Span of control and wage and salary distribution within firms. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 1 indexed citations
11.
Kemp‐Benedict, Eric. (2014). A Kaleckian Model with Intermediate Goods. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 1 indexed citations
12.
Mehta, Vishal K., et al.. (2014). Metabolic Urbanism and Environmental Justice: The Water Conundrum in Bangalore, India. Environmental Justice. 7(5). 130–137. 12 indexed citations
13.
Kemp‐Benedict, Eric. (2014). Shifting to a Green Economy: Lock-in, Path Dependence, and Policy Options. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 9 indexed citations
14.
Huber‐Lee, Annette, et al.. (2013). The Water, Energy and Food Nexus: Finding the Balance in Infrastructure Investment. AGUFM. 2013. 1 indexed citations
15.
Lazarus, Michael, Eric Kemp‐Benedict, Peter Erickson, & Harro van Asselt. (2013). International Trade and Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Could Shifting the Location of Production Bring GHG benefits?. 4 indexed citations
16.
Dermawan, Ahmad, Eric Kemp‐Benedict, Annette Huber‐Lee, & Amanda Fencl. (2012). Testing a multi-scale scenario approach for smallholder tree plantations in Indonesia and Vietnam. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 80(4). 762–771. 11 indexed citations
17.
Kemp‐Benedict, Eric, Simón Cook, Steve Vosti, et al.. (2011). Connections between poverty, water and agriculture: evidence from 10 river basins. Water International. 36(1). 125–140. 23 indexed citations
18.
Kirby, Mac, et al.. (2009). CPWF Project Report. 3 indexed citations
19.
Kirby, M., et al.. (2009). Mekong Basin Focal Project: Final Report. 1 indexed citations
20.
Raskin, Paul & Eric Kemp‐Benedict. (2004). Global environment outlook scenario framework : background paper for UNEP's third global environment outlook report (GEO-3). 25 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026