H.A.M.J. ten Have

48 papers receiving 684 citations

Peers

H.A.M.J. ten Have
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 431
  • General Health Professions 348
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 130
  • Clinical Psychology 107
  • Physiology 67
Replace Udo Schüklenk with:
Udo Schüklenk Canada
Merle Spriggs Australia
Ana S. Iltis United States
Alexandra Hawkey Australia
Katherine J. Mathews United States
Tereza Cristina Cavalcanti Ferreira de Araújo Brazil
Anne Grinyer United Kingdom
Louise Bryant United Kingdom
James Lindemann Nelson United States
Carol Dumelow United Kingdom
H.A.M.J. ten Have relative to Udo Schüklenk Canada Udo Schüklenk's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Udo Schüklenk · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H.A.M.J. ten Have

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H.A.M.J. ten Have's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H.A.M.J. ten Have with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H.A.M.J. ten Have more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H.A.M.J. ten Have

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H.A.M.J. ten Have. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H.A.M.J. ten Have. The network helps show where H.A.M.J. ten Have may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of H.A.M.J. ten Have

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of H.A.M.J. ten Have. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of H.A.M.J. ten Have based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with H.A.M.J. ten Have. H.A.M.J. ten Have is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 2
2 37
3 10
4 16
5 10
6 29
7 22
8 2
9 15
10 40
11
Controversen rondom terminale sedatie.
2
12
The ethics of palliative care. European perspectives
30
13 41
14 26
15 19
16 12
17
Het gen als ziel van de mens
1
18 4
19 3
20 11

About H.A.M.J. ten Have

H.A.M.J. ten Have is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 49 papers that have together received 749 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in medical practice (24 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (17 papers) and Patient Dignity and Privacy (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (431 citations), General Health Professions (348 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (130 citations). H.A.M.J. ten Have has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Bert Gordijn, F Eulderink, Rob Reuzel, Gert Jan van der Wilt, Jos V. M. Welie, Rien Janssens, Zbigniew Żylicz, Abdallah Adlan, Pieter F. de Vries Robbé and Stuart F. Spicker. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Pathology, Medical Education and Journal of Pain and Symptom Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026