Hafsa Afroz
About
In The Last Decade
Hafsa Afroz
10 papers receiving 105 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Food Science 39
- Molecular Medicine 20
- Plant Science 19
- Epidemiology 19
- Infectious Diseases 16
Countries citing papers authored by Hafsa Afroz
This map shows the geographic impact of Hafsa Afroz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hafsa Afroz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hafsa Afroz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hafsa Afroz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hafsa Afroz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hafsa Afroz. The network helps show where Hafsa Afroz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hafsa Afroz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hafsa Afroz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hafsa Afroz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hafsa Afroz. Hafsa Afroz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | Relaparotomy Following Caesarean Section: A Cross Sectional Study. | 0 |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 20 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 29 | |
| 12 | 14 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.