H. Maeter

556 total citations
8 papers, 432 citations indexed

About

H. Maeter is a scholar working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Condensed Matter Physics and Accounting. According to data from OpenAlex, H. Maeter has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 432 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, 5 papers in Condensed Matter Physics and 2 papers in Accounting. Recurrent topics in H. Maeter's work include Iron-based superconductors research (7 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (3 papers) and Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (3 papers). H. Maeter is often cited by papers focused on Iron-based superconductors research (7 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (3 papers) and Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (3 papers). H. Maeter collaborates with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and Japan. H. Maeter's co-authors include H. Luetkens, A. Amato, H.‐H. Klauß, R. Khasanov, Gwendolyne Pascua, B. Büchner, G. Behr, C. Baines, M. R. Lees and M. Nicklas and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physical Review B and New Journal of Physics.

In The Last Decade

H. Maeter

8 papers receiving 423 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
H. Maeter Switzerland	7	370	325	74	74	34	8	432
Gwendolyne Pascua Switzerland	9	303 0.8×	270 0.8×	75 1.0×	47 0.6×	50 1.5×	14	386
Matthias Elender Switzerland	5	266 0.7×	227 0.7×	78 1.1×	52 0.7×	32 0.9×	7	319
M. D. Vannette United States	11	283 0.8×	370 1.1×	32 0.4×	75 1.0×	81 2.4×	19	439
J. H. Bowen China	4	304 0.8×	408 1.3×	75 1.0×	121 1.6×	48 1.4×	4	460
S. L. Bud'ko United States	11	320 0.9×	305 0.9×	90 1.2×	32 0.4×	49 1.4×	21	373
C. Lester United Kingdom	9	514 1.4×	518 1.6×	31 0.4×	76 1.0×	64 1.9×	13	609
P. C. Canfield United States	11	360 1.0×	444 1.4×	42 0.6×	106 1.4×	31 0.9×	16	476
Delong Fang China	12	391 1.1×	422 1.3×	101 1.4×	91 1.2×	81 2.4×	16	501
Udhara S. Kaluarachchi United States	13	373 1.0×	396 1.2×	66 0.9×	53 0.7×	48 1.4×	26	456
P. Wiecki United States	12	215 0.6×	232 0.7×	32 0.4×	39 0.5×	11 0.3×	15	332

Countries citing papers authored by H. Maeter

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. Maeter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. Maeter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. Maeter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. Maeter

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. Maeter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. Maeter. The network helps show where H. Maeter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of H. Maeter

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of H. Maeter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of H. Maeter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with H. Maeter. H. Maeter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Janson, Oleg, H.‐J. Grafe, A. P. Dioguardi, et al.. (2019). Ground state and low-temperature magnetism of the quasi-two-dimensional honeycomb compound InCu2/3V1/3O3. Physical review. B.. 100(14). 5 indexed citations

2.

Kamusella, Sirko, Rajib Sarkar, H. Maeter, et al.. (2015). Coexistence of superconductivity and magnetism inCa1−xNaxFe2As2: Universal suppression of the magnetic order parameter in 122 iron pnictides. Physical Review B. 92(13). 20 indexed citations

3.

Biswas⃰, Pabitra Kumar, H. Luetkens, Titus Neupert, et al.. (2013). Evidence for superconductivity with broken time-reversal symmetry in locally noncentrosymmetric SrPtAs. Physical Review B. 87(18). 160 indexed citations

4.

Shermadini, Z., C. Baines, M. Bendele, et al.. (2010). Microscopic study of the superconducting state of the iron pnictideRbFe2As2via muon spin rotation. Physical Review B. 82(14). 24 indexed citations

5.

Luetkens, H., Gwendolyne Pascua, Kathrin Hofmann, et al.. (2010). Enhanced two-dimensional behavior of metastableT′-La2CuO4, the parent compound of electron-doped cuprate superconductors. Physical Review B. 82(18). 30 indexed citations

6.

Khasanov, R., A. Maisuradze, H. Maeter, et al.. (2009). Superconductivity and Field-Induced Magnetism inSrFe1.75Co0.25As2. Physical Review Letters. 103(6). 67010–67010. 32 indexed citations

7.

Fuchs, G., S.‐L. Drechsler, N. Kozlova, et al.. (2009). Orbital and spin effects for the upper critical field in As-deficient disordered Fe pnictide superconductors. New Journal of Physics. 11(7). 75007–75007. 58 indexed citations

8.

Maeter, H., H. Luetkens, Yu. G. Pashkevich, et al.. (2009). Interplay of rare earth and iron magnetism inRFeAsO(R=La, Ce, Pr, and Sm): Muon-spin relaxation study and symmetry analysis. Physical Review B. 80(9). 103 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact