H. M. Piper
- Molecular Biology
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Physiology
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Co-authors
- K.‐D. SchlüterY LadilovThomas NollAlbrecht HempelSilvia HaffnerH MaxeinerGerhild EulerBritta Siegmund
- Topics
- Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (7 papers)Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (6 papers)Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (6 papers)
- Cited by
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular MedicinePathology and Forensic MedicineCellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Journals
- The FASEB JournalCardiovascular ResearchAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
- Partner nations
- GermanyIsraelUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
H. M. Piper
23 papers receiving 698 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Molecular Biology 432
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 275
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 171
- Physiology 161
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 133
Countries citing papers authored by H. M. Piper
This map shows the geographic impact of H. M. Piper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. M. Piper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. M. Piper more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by H. M. Piper
This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. M. Piper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. M. Piper. The network helps show where H. M. Piper may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of H. M. Piper
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of H. M. Piper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of H. M. Piper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with H. M. Piper. H. M. Piper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | |
| 2 | 77 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 24 | |
| 6 | 23 | |
| 7 | 24 | |
| 8 | 21 | |
| 9 | 48 | |
| 10 | 110 | |
| 11 | 15 | |
| 12 | 29 | |
| 13 | 95 | |
| 14 | 38 | |
| 15 | 19 | |
| 16 | 75 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 46 | |
| 19 | 20 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About H. M. Piper
H. M. Piper is a scholar working on Aging, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 23 papers that have together received 722 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (7 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (6 papers) and Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (275 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (171 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (133 citations). H. M. Piper has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Israel and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include K.‐D. Schlüter, Y Ladilov, Thomas Noll, Albrecht Hempel, Silvia Haffner, H Maxeiner, Gerhild Euler, Britta Siegmund, Jacqueline Heger and A. Muhs. Their work appears in journals such as The FASEB Journal, Cardiovascular Research and American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.