H. Looft

1.1k citations
32 papers · 835 indexed · h-index 15

H. Looft

32 papers receiving 782 citations

Peers

H. Looft
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Animal Science and Zoology 578
  • Small Animals 342
  • Genetics 441
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 54
  • Aquatic Science 25
Replace O. I. Southwood with:
O. I. Southwood United Kingdom
P. McGilchrist Australia
L. R. Giles Australia
W. Kapelański Poland
D. M. Ferguson Australia
A.G. de Vries Netherlands
R D Green United States
E. Le Bihan‐Duval France
Marco Tazzoli Italy
G. Zięba Poland
H. Looft relative to O. I. Southwood United Kingdom O. I. Southwood's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
O. I. Southwood · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H. Looft

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. Looft's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. Looft with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. Looft more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. Looft

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. Looft. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. Looft. The network helps show where H. Looft may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside H. Looft, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with H. Looft Line = papers co-authored together H. Looft links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
The role of bacterial pathogens in coliform mastitis in sows.
201411
2 201310
3 201111
4 20079
5 200737
6
Genetic parameters for behaviour traits in sows.
20063
7 200668
8 200641
9 200646
10 200525
11 200548
12 200493
13 20037
14 200317
15
Biological growth model as a new selection strategy for improvement of feed efficiency in swine
20025
16
Genetic association between individual feed intake during performance test and reproductions traits in pigs.
20005
17 20007
18 20006
19 199968
20 19992

About H. Looft

H. Looft is a scholar working on Small Animals, Animal Science and Zoology, Genetics, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Agronomy and Crop Science, having authored 32 papers that have together received 835 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Nutrition and Physiology (24 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (23 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (21 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (7 papers), Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals (5 papers), Agriculture and Biological Studies (2 papers), melanin and skin pigmentation (1 paper) and Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (578 citations), Small Animals (342 citations), Genetics (441 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (54 citations) and Aquatic Science (25 citations). H. Looft has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include E. Kalm, R. Roehe, Graham Plastow, P. W. Knap, N. Reinsch, G. R. Evans, A. Susenbeth, Justo Lorenzo Bermejo, Richard Wales and M. F. Rothschild. Their work appears in journals such as Meat Science, Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Animal Genetics, Livestock Science and Animal Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026