This map shows the geographic impact of H. K. Pathak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. K. Pathak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. K. Pathak more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. K. Pathak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. K. Pathak. The network helps show where H. K. Pathak may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of H. K. Pathak
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of H. K. Pathak.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of H. K. Pathak based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with H. K. Pathak. H. K. Pathak is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Sharma, Amit, et al.. (2019). Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Pediatric age Group: Our Experience. 6(3). 1–4.1 indexed citations
2.
Pathak, H. K., et al.. (2019). Common Fixed Point Theorems in Complex Valued Metric Space and Application. Thai Journal of Mathematics. 17(1). 75–88.
Andankar, Mukund, et al.. (2016). Two cases of retained ureteral stents presenting with breakage andencrustations. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 5(10). 208–212.2 indexed citations
5.
Deepmala, Deepmala & H. K. Pathak. (2013). Study on existence of solutions for some nonlinear functional-integral equations with applications. Mathematical communications. 18(1). 97–107.22 indexed citations
6.
Pathak, H. K., et al.. (2013). A generalization of Nadler’s fixed point theorem and its application to nonconvex integral inclusions. Topological Methods in Nonlinear Analysis. 41(1). 207–227.8 indexed citations
7.
Pathak, H. K., et al.. (2013). A COMMON FIXED POINT THEOREM OF INTEGRAL TYPE USING IMPLICIT RELATION. Nonlinear functional analysis and applications. 1–12.4 indexed citations
Deepmala, Deepmala & H. K. Pathak. (2013). On Solutions of Some Functional-Integral Equations in Banach Algebra. Research Journal of Science and Technology. 5(3). 358–362.3 indexed citations
10.
Pathak, H. K., et al.. (2012). Common Fixed Point Theorems Using Property (E.A) in Complex-Valued Metric Spaces. Thai Journal of Mathematics. 11(2). 347–355.30 indexed citations
Pathak, H. K., et al.. (2011). Common Fixed Point and Best Simultaneous Approximations Theorems Under Releaxed Conditions. 15(5). 17–22.1 indexed citations
Pathak, H. K., et al.. (2002). Fixed and coincidence points of hybrid mappings. Archivum Mathematicum. 38(3). 201–208.18 indexed citations
16.
Pathak, H. K. & M. S. Khan. (1997). A comparision of various types of compatible maps and common fixed points. 28(4). 477–485.14 indexed citations
17.
Pathak, H. K., et al.. (1995). Fixed point theorems for compatible mappings of type (P) and applications to dynamic programming. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.73 indexed citations
18.
Pathak, H. K. & Shin Min Kang. (1995). COMMON FIXED POINTS OF COMPATIBLE MAPPINGS OF TYPE(A). East Asian Mathematical Journal. 11(1). 65–71.1 indexed citations
19.
Pathak, H. K., et al.. (1995). WEAK COMPATIBLE MAPPINGS OF TYPE (A) AND COMMON FIXED POINTS IN MENGER SPACES. Communications of the Korean Mathematical Society. 10(1). 67–83.4 indexed citations
20.
Pathak, H. K., et al.. (1995). SOME FIXED POINT THEOREMS OF EXPANSION MAPPINGS. East Asian Mathematical Journal. 11(1). 73–80.12 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.