Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Coupled fixed point theorems for nonlinear contractions in partially ordered metric spaces
Countries citing papers authored by Łjubomir Ćirić
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Łjubomir Ćirić's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Łjubomir Ćirić with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Łjubomir Ćirić more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Łjubomir Ćirić. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Łjubomir Ćirić. The network helps show where Łjubomir Ćirić may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Łjubomir Ćirić
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Łjubomir Ćirić.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Łjubomir Ćirić based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Łjubomir Ćirić. Łjubomir Ćirić is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Ćirić, Łjubomir, et al.. (2012). Coupled fixed point theorems for mappings satisfying a contractive condition of rational type on a partially ordered metric space. 2(1). 1–8.12 indexed citations
Ćirić, Łjubomir, et al.. (2007). ON PRESIC TYPE GENERALIZATION OF THE BANACH CONTRACTION MAPPING PRINCIPLE. 76(2). 143–147.31 indexed citations
9.
Ćirić, Łjubomir. (2006). Common fixed point thorems for set-valued mappings. 39. 419–428.2 indexed citations
10.
Ćirić, Łjubomir, Jeong Sheok Ume, & M. S. Khan. (2003). On the convergence of the Ishikawa iterates to a common fixed point of two mappings. Archivum Mathematicum. 39(2). 123–127.18 indexed citations
11.
Ćirić, Łjubomir. (1997). A Counterexample to a Theorem of Xu. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications. 213(2). 723–725.2 indexed citations
12.
Ćirić, Łjubomir. (1993). On Diviccaro, Fisher and Sessa open questions. Archivum Mathematicum. 29. 145–152.14 indexed citations
Ćirić, Łjubomir. (1992). A generalization of Caristi's fixed point theorem.. 3(2). 51–57.7 indexed citations
15.
Ćirić, Łjubomir. (1984). A Fixed Point Theorem in Reflexive Banach Spaces. Publications de l Institut Mathematique. 105–106.4 indexed citations
16.
Ćirić, Łjubomir. (1981). Fixed-point Mappings on Compact Metric Spaces. Publications de l Institut Mathematique. 29–31.1 indexed citations
17.
Ćirić, Łjubomir. (1977). Quasi-Contractions In Banach Spaces. Publications de l Institut Mathematique. 41–48.12 indexed citations
18.
Ćirić, Łjubomir. (1975). On Fixed Points Of Generalized Contractions On Probabilistic Metric Spaces. Publications de l Institut Mathematique. 71–78.14 indexed citations
19.
Ćirić, Łjubomir. (1974). On a family of contractive maps and fixed points. Publications de l Institut Mathematique. 45–51.30 indexed citations
20.
Ćirić, Łjubomir. (1971). A Certain Class Of Mappings In Topological Spaces. Publications de l Institut Mathematique. 27–30.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.