H. James Hoover
- Artificial Intelligence top 5%
- Information Systems top 5%
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 2%
- Software top 5%
- Computer Networks and Communications top 10%
- Co-authors
- Stephen CookPaul BeameRaymond GreenlawWalter L. RuzzoPaul SorensonPablo FigueroaMark GreenLing Liu
- Topics
- Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (14 papers)Software Engineering Research (8 papers)Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesHong Kong
In The Last Decade
H. James Hoover
34 papers receiving 650 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Artificial Intelligence 372
- Information Systems 240
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 237
- Software 107
- Computer Networks and Communications 104
Countries citing papers authored by H. James Hoover
This map shows the geographic impact of H. James Hoover's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. James Hoover with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. James Hoover more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by H. James Hoover
This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. James Hoover. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. James Hoover. The network helps show where H. James Hoover may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of H. James Hoover
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of H. James Hoover. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of H. James Hoover based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with H. James Hoover. H. James Hoover is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | Specifying framework constraints with FCL | 7 |
| 9 | 13 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 21 | |
| 15 | Fundamentals Of The Theory Of Computation: Principles And Practice | 7 |
| 16 | An Exercise in Using Constructive Proof Systems to Address Feature Interactions in Telephony. | 2 |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 151 | |
| 19 | 49 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About H. James Hoover
H. James Hoover is a scholar working on Software, Development and Information Systems, having authored 35 papers that have together received 721 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (14 papers), Software Engineering Research (8 papers) and Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Software (107 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (237 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (372 citations). H. James Hoover has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Cook, Paul Beame, Raymond Greenlaw, Walter L. Ruzzo, Paul Sorenson, Pablo Figueroa, Mark Green, Ling Liu, Maria Klawe and Nicholas Pippenger. Their work appears in journals such as Computers & Education, ACM Computing Surveys and IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.