H. J. Rocha–Pinto
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 2%
- Instrumentation top 2%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics
- Computational Mechanics
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Co-authors
- W. J. MacielSteven R. MajewskiJeffrey D. CraneA. MiloneR. da SilvaMichael F. SkrutskieRichard J. PattersonF. Almeida-Fernandes
- Topics
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (37 papers)Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (19 papers)Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (18 papers)
- Journals
- The Astrophysical JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyAstronomy and Astrophysics
- Partner nations
- BrazilUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
H. J. Rocha–Pinto
39 papers receiving 929 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 953
- Instrumentation 423
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 39
- Computational Mechanics 30
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 17
Countries citing papers authored by H. J. Rocha–Pinto
This map shows the geographic impact of H. J. Rocha–Pinto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. J. Rocha–Pinto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. J. Rocha–Pinto more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by H. J. Rocha–Pinto
This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. J. Rocha–Pinto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. J. Rocha–Pinto. The network helps show where H. J. Rocha–Pinto may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of H. J. Rocha–Pinto
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of H. J. Rocha–Pinto. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of H. J. Rocha–Pinto based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with H. J. Rocha–Pinto. H. J. Rocha–Pinto is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 13 | |
| 6 | 19 | |
| 7 | 54 | |
| 8 | 55 | |
| 9 | 62 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 19 | |
| 12 | Galactic Structure and Star Formation in Vela-Carina | 3 |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 21 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 90 | |
| 17 | 24 | |
| 18 | 45 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 83 |
About H. J. Rocha–Pinto
H. J. Rocha–Pinto is a scholar working on Instrumentation, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Spectroscopy, having authored 40 papers that have together received 979 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (37 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (19 papers) and Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (18 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (423 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (953 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (39 citations). H. J. Rocha–Pinto has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include W. J. Maciel, Steven R. Majewski, Jeffrey D. Crane, A. Milone, R. da Silva, Michael F. Skrutskie, Richard J. Patterson, F. Almeida-Fernandes, Mirek Giersz and Diogo Belloni. Their work appears in journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and Astronomy and Astrophysics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.