Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
GLIMPSE. I. AnSIRTFLegacy Project to Map the Inner Galaxy
2003783 citationsRobert A. Benjamin, E. Churchwell et al.Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacificprofile →
TheSpitzer/GLIMPSE Surveys: A New View of the Milky Way
2009584 citationsE. Churchwell, B. Babler et al.Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacificprofile →
The Wavelength Dependence of Interstellar Extinction from 1.25 to 8.0 μm Using GLIMPSE Data
2005500 citationsR. Indebetouw, B. Babler et al.The Astrophysical Journalprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of B. Babler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B. Babler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B. Babler more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by B. Babler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B. Babler. The network helps show where B. Babler may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of B. Babler
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of B. Babler.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of B. Babler based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with B. Babler. B. Babler is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Benjamin, Robert A., B. Babler, Elena D’Onghia, et al.. (2016). Three Dimensional Stellar Kinematics of the Galactic Bar and Disk: Where APOGEE Meets GLIMPSE. 13117.1 indexed citations
Peek, J. E. G., B. Babler, Kevin A. Douglas, et al.. (2016). The Galactic Arecibo L-Band Feed Array Survey Data Release 2. AAS. 227.
8.
Benjamin, Robert A., B. Babler, E. Churchwell, et al.. (2015). GLIMPSE Proper: Mid-Infrared Observations of Proper Motion and Variability Towards Galactic Center. 12023.1 indexed citations
Whitney, B. A., Robert A. Benjamin, B. Babler, et al.. (2011). Glimpse360: Observing The Outback Of The Galaxy. 217.1 indexed citations
13.
Churchwell, E., B. Babler, M. R. Meade, et al.. (2009). TheSpitzer/GLIMPSE Surveys: A New View of the Milky Way. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. 121(877). 213–230.584 indexed citations breakdown →
Majewski, Steven R., B. Babler, E. Churchwell, et al.. (2007). Galactic Structure and Star Formation in Vela-Carina. 40791.3 indexed citations
16.
Мирошниченко, А. С., et al.. (2006). The Asymmetrical Wind of the Candidate Luminous Blue Variable MWC 314. NC Digital Online Collection of Knowledge and Scholarship (The University of North Carolina at Greensboro).6 indexed citations
17.
Benjamin, Robert A., E. Churchwell, B. Babler, et al.. (2006). GLIMPSE 3D: The Vertical Stellar and Interstellar Structure of the Inner Galaxy. 30570.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.