H. I. Day

563 citations
15 papers · 354 indexed · h-index 7

H. I. Day

14 papers receiving 306 citations

Peers

H. I. Day
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Occupational Therapy 69
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 132
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 6
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 74
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 58
Replace Thomas Rhys Evans with:
Thomas Rhys Evans United Kingdom
Vietta E. Wilson Canada
Kathleen Bodisch Lynch United States
Sarah Lock United Kingdom
Rupal Patel United States
Gloria Rojo Mota Spain
Stephen B. Richards United States
Silviu Matu Romania
Ingvild Saksvik‐Lehouillier Norway
Liliana Alvarez Canada
H. I. Day relative to Thomas Rhys Evans United Kingdom Thomas Rhys Evans's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Thomas Rhys Evans · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H. I. Day

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. I. Day's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. I. Day with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. I. Day more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. I. Day

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. I. Day. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. I. Day. The network helps show where H. I. Day may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 8 scholars most cited alongside H. I. Day, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with H. I. Day Line = papers co-authored together H. I. Day links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2002113
2 199649
3 198288
4 19771
5
Work and Leisure: Two Sides of the Same Coin
19721
6 19727
7
A New Look at Work, Play and Job Satisfaction.
19713
8 197135
9
Symposium on intrinsic motivation : a new direction in education /
19716
10 196917
11
ASSOCIATION VALUE AND SUBJECTIVE RATINGS OF INTEREST IN VISUAL COMPLEXITY.
19681
12 196823
13
Two Necessary Conditions for Creativity.
19682
14 19673
15 19675

About H. I. Day

H. I. Day is a scholar working on General Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Occupational Therapy, having authored 15 papers that have together received 354 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychological and Educational Research Studies (4 papers), Spatial Cognition and Navigation (2 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (1 paper), Neural dynamics and brain function (1 paper), Outdoor and Experiential Education (1 paper), Face Recognition and Perception (1 paper), Visual Attention and Saliency Detection (1 paper) and Design Education and Practice (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Occupational Therapy (69 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (132 citations) and Medical Laboratory Technology (6 citations). H. I. Day has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Kent A. Campbell, Jeffrey W. Jutai, David R. Evans, Rachel Langevin, D. E. Berlyne, Ron Langevin, David E. Hunt and Daniel R. Evans. Their work appears in journals such as Disability and Rehabilitation, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, The Journal of Special Education, Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement and Perceptual and Motor Skills.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026