H. E. Wilhelm

601 citations
82 papers · 444 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

H. E. Wilhelm

73 papers receiving 403 citations

Peers

H. E. Wilhelm
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 212
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 78
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 80
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 63
  • Computational Mechanics 83
Replace J. L. Delcroix with:
J. L. Delcroix France
J. Oxenius France
G. Coppa Italy
E. W. Laing United Kingdom
G. A. Estévez Puerto Rico
J. A. Johnson United States
W. E. Bies United States
V.O. Jensen Italy
Patricio Cordero Chile
J. A. McLennan United States
H. E. Wilhelm relative to J. L. Delcroix France J. L. Delcroix's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
J. L. Delcroix · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H. E. Wilhelm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. E. Wilhelm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. E. Wilhelm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. E. Wilhelm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. E. Wilhelm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. E. Wilhelm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. E. Wilhelm. The network helps show where H. E. Wilhelm may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside H. E. Wilhelm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with H. E. Wilhelm Line = papers co-authored together H. E. Wilhelm links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 82 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197074
2 197438
3 197527
4 197118
5 197316
6 196711
7 201210
8 197610
9 19779
10 19809
11 19718
12 19727
13 20227
14 19777
15 19777
16 19837
17 19846
18 19746
19 19766
20 19816

About H. E. Wilhelm

H. E. Wilhelm is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Computational Mechanics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Applied Mathematics, having authored 82 papers that have together received 444 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (15 papers), Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory (12 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (10 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (9 papers), Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (8 papers), Nanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer (8 papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (8 papers) and Earthquake Detection and Analysis (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (212 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (78 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (80 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (63 citations) and Computational Mechanics (83 citations). H. E. Wilhelm has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Israel. Frequent co-authors include N. Liron, Sung‐Hoon Hong, S. H. Kim, Seung Hwa Hong, Bhola N. Dwivedi, K. Wilhelm, Muhammad A. Hasan, B. R. Kusse, Euan Freeman and R. T. Schneider. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Physics, The Journal of Chemical Physics, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, Applied Physics B and Radio Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact