Gyula Pinke

994 total citations
57 papers, 749 citations indexed

About

Gyula Pinke is a scholar working on Plant Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, Gyula Pinke has authored 57 papers receiving a total of 749 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 44 papers in Plant Science, 17 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 16 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in Gyula Pinke's work include Weed Control and Herbicide Applications (19 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (17 papers) and Plant and animal studies (16 papers). Gyula Pinke is often cited by papers focused on Weed Control and Herbicide Applications (19 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (17 papers) and Plant and animal studies (16 papers). Gyula Pinke collaborates with scholars based in Hungary, Italy and Slovakia. Gyula Pinke's co-authors include Zoltán Botta‐Dukát, Bálint Czúcz, Róbert W. Pál, Péter Karácsony, P. Reisinger, Attila Lengyel, Judit Hohmann, Andrea Vasas, Péter Forgó and Richard M. Gunton and has published in prestigious journals such as Tetrahedron, Journal of Applied Ecology and Journal of Natural Products.

In The Last Decade

Gyula Pinke

52 papers receiving 706 citations

Peers

Gyula Pinke

EEBS

NLC

Mahesh K. Upadhyaya Canada

Jose G. Maciá‐Vicente Germany

Larry W. Mitich United States

G. H. Dar India

Qiujin Xie China

Alexandra Stoll Chile

Marie-Noëlle Binet France

Anthony M. Haigh Australia

K. Udaiyan India

Inderjit India

Mahesh K. Upadhyaya Canada

Gyula Pinke

808 ×1.5

185 ×0.8

EEBS

133 ×0.7

NLC

164 ×1.2

89 ×1.1

Citations per year, relative to Gyula Pinke Gyula Pinke (= 1×) peers Mahesh K. Upadhyaya

Countries citing papers authored by Gyula Pinke

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gyula Pinke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gyula Pinke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gyula Pinke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gyula Pinke

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gyula Pinke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gyula Pinke. The network helps show where Gyula Pinke may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gyula Pinke

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gyula Pinke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gyula Pinke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gyula Pinke. Gyula Pinke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Németh, Attila, Balázs Horváth, & Gyula Pinke. (2024). A csemege baraboly (Chaerophyllum bulbosum) etnobotanikai és kultúrtörténeti jelentősége a Kárpát-medencében. 29(2). 141–159. 2 indexed citations

Pinke, Gyula, et al.. (2024). Drivers of species composition in arable‐weed communities of the Austrian–Hungarian borderland region: What is the role of the country?. Applied Vegetation Science. 27(1). 2 indexed citations

Metcalfe, Helen, Jana Bürger, A. Cirujeda, et al.. (2022). The utility of the ‘Arable Weeds and Management in Europe’ database: Challenges and opportunities of combining weed survey data at a European scale. Weed Research. 63(1). 1–11. 4 indexed citations

Pinke, Gyula, et al.. (2022). Weed Composition in Hungarian Phacelia (Phacelia tanacetifolia Benth.) Seed Production: Could Tine Harrow Take over Chemical Management?. Agronomy. 12(4). 891–891. 9 indexed citations

Andreasen, Christian, J. Holec, Dionissios Kalivas, et al.. (2019). Weed surveys and weed mapping in Europe: State of the art and future tasks. Crop Protection. 129. 105010–105010. 43 indexed citations

Tóth, Barbara, Norbert Kúsz, Péter Forgó, et al.. (2017). Abietane diterpenoids from Sideritis montana L. and their antiproliferative activity. Fitoterapia. 122. 90–94. 16 indexed citations

Rédei, Dóra, et al.. (2015). First phytochemical investigation of secondary metabolites ofEuphorbia davidiiSubils. and antiproliferative activity of its extracts. Acta Biologica Hungarica. 66(4). 464–467. 6 indexed citations

Mesterházy, Attila, János Csiky, Róbert W. Pál, & Gyula Pinke. (2014). A Najas gracillima (A. Braun ex Engelmann) Magnus előfordulása Magyarországon. 19(1). 43–49. 1 indexed citations

Pinke, Gyula, et al.. (2014). Use of mesotrione and tembotrione herbicides for post-emergence weed control in alkaloid poppy (Papaver somniferum). International Journal of Pest Management. 60(3). 187–195. 9 indexed citations

10.

Pál, Róbert W., Gyula Pinke, Zoltán Botta‐Dukát, et al.. (2012). Can management intensity be more important than environmental factors? A case study along an extreme elevation gradient from central Italian cereal fields. Plant Biosystems - An International Journal Dealing with all Aspects of Plant Biology. 147(2). 343–353. 25 indexed citations

11.

Pinke, Gyula, et al.. (2012). The first occurrence of Euphorbia davidii in Hungary.. 48(3). 117–120. 4 indexed citations

12.

Barina, Zoltán, et al.. (2012). Current distribution and spreading of Euphorbia davidii (E. dentata agg.) in Europe. Open Life Sciences. 8(1). 87–95. 17 indexed citations

13.

Pinke, Gyula, Gergely Király, Zoltán Barina, et al.. (2011). Assessment of endangered synanthropic plants of Hungary with special attention to arable weeds. Plant Biosystems - An International Journal Dealing with all Aspects of Plant Biology. 145(2). 426–435. 29 indexed citations

14.

Pinke, Gyula, Péter Karácsony, Bálint Czúcz, & Zoltán Botta‐Dukát. (2011). Environmental and land-use variables determining the abundance of Ambrosia artemisiifolia in arable fields in Hungary.. Preslia. 83(2). 219–235. 52 indexed citations

15.

Pinke, Gyula & Péter Karácsony. (2010). Weed survey of sunflower fields in Hungary.. 46(9). 425–429. 2 indexed citations

16.

Pinke, Gyula & Róbert W. Pál. (2008). Phytosociological and conservational study of the arable weed communities in western Hungary. Plant Biosystems - An International Journal Dealing with all Aspects of Plant Biology. 142(3). 491–508. 21 indexed citations

17.

Pinke, Gyula. (2001). Segetal weed vegetation on extensively cultivated farmland on the Lesser Plain (north-west Hungary). II. Stubble-fields, summer annual crops; study of life-form and chorological composition.. Növénytermelés. 50(1). 17–29. 1 indexed citations

18.

Pinke, Gyula. (2000). Die Ackerwildkraut-Gesellschaften extensiv bewirtschafteter Felder in der Kleinen Ungarischen Tiefebene. Publication Server of Goethe University Frankfurt am Main (Goethe University Frankfurt). 1 indexed citations

19.

Pinke, Gyula. (2000). Weed communities on extensive fields in the Lesser Plain of northwestern Hungary.. Tuexenia. 335–364. 1 indexed citations

20.

Pinke, Gyula, et al.. (1997). Changes in the weed flora of maize fields in Szigetköz (north-west Hungary) between 1990 and 1996.. 39. 15–19. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact