Gwen S. Rees
- Molecular Biology
- Immunology
- Genetics
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 5%
- Co-authors
- Giamal N. LuheshiE. Janet TawnT. D. SouthgateMaría G. CastroPedro R. LöwensteinG. M. TARRANTChristopher K. GeeS. Poole
- Topics
- DNA Repair Mechanisms (7 papers)Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (5 papers)Effects of Radiation Exposure (5 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of NeuroscienceBritish Journal of CancerAmerican Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
- Partner nations
- United KingdomDenmarkUnited States
In The Last Decade
Gwen S. Rees
14 papers receiving 449 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Molecular Biology 173
- Immunology 98
- Genetics 87
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 77
- Behavioral Neuroscience 74
Countries citing papers authored by Gwen S. Rees
This map shows the geographic impact of Gwen S. Rees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gwen S. Rees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gwen S. Rees more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gwen S. Rees
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gwen S. Rees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gwen S. Rees. The network helps show where Gwen S. Rees may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gwen S. Rees
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gwen S. Rees. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gwen S. Rees based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gwen S. Rees. Gwen S. Rees is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 26 | |
| 2 | 24 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 27 | |
| 7 | 30 | |
| 8 | 21 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | 65 | |
| 11 | 94 | |
| 12 | Rat tumour necrosis factor-alpha: expression in recombinant Pichia pastoris, purification, characterization and development of a novel ELISA. | 45 |
| 13 | 97 | |
| 14 | 1 |
About Gwen S. Rees
Gwen S. Rees is a scholar working on Biological Psychiatry, Cancer Research and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 14 papers that have together received 461 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include DNA Repair Mechanisms (7 papers), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (5 papers) and Effects of Radiation Exposure (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (55 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (74 citations) and Neurology (60 citations). Gwen S. Rees has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Denmark and United States. Frequent co-authors include Giamal N. Luheshi, E. Janet Tawn, T. D. Southgate, María G. Castro, Pedro R. Löwenstein, G. M. TARRANT, Christopher K. Gee, S. Poole, Christine Ball and Adrian F. Bristow. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, British Journal of Cancer and American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.