Christopher K. Gee

10 papers receiving 375 citations

Peers

Christopher K. Gee
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 21
  • Biological Psychiatry 14
  • Immunology 98
  • Hematology 41
  • Biotechnology 29
Replace Donna A. Chow with:
Donna A. Chow Canada
Sabine Mathieu Germany
Virginia Pearce United States
Mária Magócsi Hungary
Salvatore Valvo United Kingdom
Xiaoyan Lu China
Tsutomu Mori Japan
Eva Kniep Germany
Eszter Lajkó Hungary
Christopher K. Gee relative to Donna A. Chow Canada Donna A. Chow's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Donna A. Chow · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher K. Gee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher K. Gee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher K. Gee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher K. Gee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher K. Gee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher K. Gee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher K. Gee. The network helps show where Christopher K. Gee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher K. Gee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher K. Gee Line = papers co-authored together Christopher K. Gee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 200386
2 199965
3 199747
4
Rat tumour necrosis factor-alpha: expression in recombinant Pichia pastoris, purification, characterization and development of a novel ELISA.
199945
5 200242
6 199840
7 199636
8
Rat interleukin-10: production and characterisation of biologically active protein in a recombinant bacterial expression system.
200115
9
Application of an in vitro endopeptidase assay for detection of residual toxin activity in tetanus toxoids.
20028
10 20057

About Christopher K. Gee

Christopher K. Gee is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Immunology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Genetics and Hematology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 391 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Immune Response and Inflammation (3 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (3 papers), Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders (2 papers), Protease and Inhibitor Mechanisms (2 papers), Erythropoietin and Anemia Treatment (2 papers), Signaling Pathways in Disease (1 paper), Biochemical and Structural Characterization (1 paper) and Protein purification and stability (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (21 citations), Biological Psychiatry (14 citations), Immunology (98 citations), Hematology (41 citations) and Biotechnology (29 citations). Christopher K. Gee has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Cuba and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Robin Wait, S. Poole, Adrian F. Bristow, Christine Ball, Helen L. Ward, Gwen S. Rees, G. M. TARRANT, Christopher Jones, Chun-Ting Yuen and Mabel Izquierdo. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Haematology, Biologicals, Advances in experimental medicine and biology, European Journal of Biochemistry and Biomedical Chromatography.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact