Daniel Brett

705 citations
12 papers · 137 · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Brett

11 papers receiving 136 citations

Peers

Daniel Brett
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Biological Psychiatry 51
  • Pharmacology 60
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 43
  • Developmental Neuroscience 4
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 5
Replace Rodrigo P. Mello with:
Rodrigo P. Mello Brazil
Tian-Mei Si China
Ana Paula Jesus‐Nunes Brazil
Luciana Maria Sarin Brazil
Guilherme Magnavita Brazil
Constantin Volkmann Germany
Flávia Vieira Brazil
Jana Radewonuk United States
Valentin Matei Romania
Daniel Brett relative to Rodrigo P. Mello Brazil Rodrigo P. Mello's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×21×
Rodrigo P. Mello · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Brett

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Brett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Brett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Brett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Brett

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Brett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Brett. The network helps show where Daniel Brett may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Brett, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Brett Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Brett links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 201574
2 202032
3 201811
4 202210
5 20182
6 20152
7 20182
8
Corruption and anti-corruption in Romania. Finally turning the corner?
20151
9
Igor Dodon’s election: a victory for Moldova’s oligarchs?
20161
10
The ‘billion dollar protests’ in Moldova are threatening the survival of the country’s political elite
20151
11
Romania’s politics on fire: why Victor Ponta resigned and what it means for the country
20151
12
Romania’s protests: a response to a three-pronged assault on anti-corruption measures
20170

About Daniel Brett

Daniel Brett is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Biological Psychiatry, Psychiatry and Mental health, Automotive Engineering and Pharmacology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 137 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics (3 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (2 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (2 papers), Soviet and Russian History (1 paper), Culinary Culture and Tourism (1 paper), European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies (1 paper), Nutritional Studies and Diet (1 paper) and Extraction and Separation Processes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (51 citations), Pharmacology (60 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (43 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (4 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (5 citations). Daniel Brett has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Poland and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Keith Hawton, Tayla McCloud, Ben H. Amit, Caroline Caddy, Peter R Diamond, Janina Jochim, Rupert McShane, Andrea Cipriani, Jennifer M Rendell and Milagros Ruiz. Their work appears in journals such as Small Methods, Bipolar Disorders, Party Politics, European Journal of Nutrition and Electoral Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact