Nadine Dougall
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 5%
- Co-authors
- Klaus P. EbmeierGuy M. GoodwinRonan E. O’CarrollCatherine MurrayA. MoffootMarie‐Paule AustinM. RossChris Johnson
- Topics
- Health Policy Implementation Science (9 papers)Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (9 papers)Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (9 papers)
- Journals
- The LancetSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaNeuroImage
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIrelandAustralia
In The Last Decade
Nadine Dougall
73 papers receiving 2.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
- Psychiatry and Mental health 675
- Cognitive Neuroscience 563
- Clinical Psychology 322
- Pharmacology 304
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 277
Countries citing papers authored by Nadine Dougall
This map shows the geographic impact of Nadine Dougall's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadine Dougall with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadine Dougall more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nadine Dougall
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadine Dougall. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadine Dougall. The network helps show where Nadine Dougall may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nadine Dougall
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nadine Dougall. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nadine Dougall based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nadine Dougall. Nadine Dougall is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 19 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 49 | |
| 10 | 25 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 52 | |
| 15 | 36 | |
| 16 | 64 | |
| 17 | 47 | |
| 18 | 29 | |
| 19 | 65 | |
| 20 | The split-dose technique for the study of psychological and pharmacological activation with the cerebral blood flow marker 99m-Tc-exametazime and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT): reproducibility and rater reliability | 33 |
About Nadine Dougall
Nadine Dougall is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Speech and Hearing and General Health Professions, having authored 78 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Policy Implementation Science (9 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (9 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (675 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (563 citations) and Neurology (230 citations). Nadine Dougall has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Klaus P. Ebmeier, Guy M. Goodwin, Ronan E. O’Carroll, Catherine Murray, A. Moffoot, Marie‐Paule Austin, M. Ross, Chris Johnson, Clare Murray and Margaret Maxwell. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and NeuroImage.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.