Gustavo V. Guinea
- Mechanics of Materials top 0.2%
- Biomaterials top 0.2%
- Civil and Structural Engineering top 0.5%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Building and Construction top 0.5%
- Co-authors
- M. ElicesJ. PlanasJosé Pérez‐RigueiroGustavo R. PlazaF.J. GómezFrancisco J. RojoClaudio G. RoccoJ. M. Atienza
- Topics
- Silk-based biomaterials and applications (64 papers)Silkworms and Sericulture Research (35 papers)Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (23 papers)
- Partner nations
- SpainUnited StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
Gustavo V. Guinea
148 papers receiving 6.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 153
- Mechanics of Materials 2.5k
- Biomaterials 2.2k
- Civil and Structural Engineering 1.9k
- Molecular Biology 842
- Building and Construction 792
Countries citing papers authored by Gustavo V. Guinea
This map shows the geographic impact of Gustavo V. Guinea's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gustavo V. Guinea with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gustavo V. Guinea more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gustavo V. Guinea
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gustavo V. Guinea. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gustavo V. Guinea. The network helps show where Gustavo V. Guinea may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gustavo V. Guinea
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gustavo V. Guinea. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gustavo V. Guinea based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gustavo V. Guinea. Gustavo V. Guinea is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 49 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 40 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 32 | |
| 18 | 30 | |
| 19 | 26 | |
| 20 | MECHANISMS OF RUPTURE IN SPLITTING TESTS | 38 |
About Gustavo V. Guinea
Gustavo V. Guinea is a scholar working on Biomaterials, Insect Science and Mechanics of Materials, having authored 151 papers that have together received 6.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Silk-based biomaterials and applications (64 papers), Silkworms and Sericulture Research (35 papers) and Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (23 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomaterials (2.2k citations), Mechanics of Materials (2.5k citations) and Civil and Structural Engineering (1.9k citations). Gustavo V. Guinea has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include M. Elices, J. Planas, José Pérez‐Rigueiro, Gustavo R. Plaza, F.J. Gómez, Francisco J. Rojo, Claudio G. Rocco, J. M. Atienza, Daniel González‐Nieto and Jaime C. Gálvez. Their work appears in journals such as Macromolecules, Scientific Reports and International Journal of Molecular Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.