Gustavo Nolasco
- Plant Science top 5%
- Insect Science top 2%
- Endocrinology top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Cell Biology
- Co-authors
- F PonzC. de BlasFilomena FonsecaPaulo GouveiaGonçalo SilvaC.L. NiblettNatália MarquesK. L. Manjunath
- Topics
- Plant Virus Research Studies (40 papers)Plant and Fungal Interactions Research (21 papers)Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (16 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONESoil Biology and Biochemistry
In The Last Decade
Gustavo Nolasco
51 papers receiving 835 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Plant Science 809
- Insect Science 313
- Endocrinology 298
- Molecular Biology 160
- Cell Biology 89
Countries citing papers authored by Gustavo Nolasco
This map shows the geographic impact of Gustavo Nolasco's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gustavo Nolasco with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gustavo Nolasco more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gustavo Nolasco
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gustavo Nolasco. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gustavo Nolasco. The network helps show where Gustavo Nolasco may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gustavo Nolasco
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gustavo Nolasco. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gustavo Nolasco based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gustavo Nolasco. Gustavo Nolasco is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | Evaluación de cuatro métodos de extracción de aceite de la semilla de piñón (Jatropha curcas) var. Cabo Verde y cuantificación de sus ésteres de forbol | 1 |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 20 | |
| 8 | 31 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | 24 | |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 43 | |
| 17 | A reassessment of the anamorphic fungus Fusicoccum luteum and description of its teleomorph Botryosphaeria lutea sp nov | 47 |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 58 | |
| 20 | Sensitive CTV diagnosis using immunocapture, reverse transcriptional polymerase chain reaction and an exonuclease fluorescent probe assay | 4 |
About Gustavo Nolasco
Gustavo Nolasco is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Insect Science and Plant Science, having authored 52 papers that have together received 899 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Virus Research Studies (40 papers), Plant and Fungal Interactions Research (21 papers) and Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology (298 citations), Horticulture (38 citations) and Insect Science (313 citations). Gustavo Nolasco has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Croatia and Spain. Frequent co-authors include F Ponz, C. de Blas, Filomena Fonseca, Paulo Gouveia, Gonçalo Silva, C.L. Niblett, Natália Marques, K. L. Manjunath, A. Bailey and David J. Mitchell. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Soil Biology and Biochemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.