Gustavo Anríquez
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences top 2%
- Soil Science top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- General Health Professions
- Co-authors
- Silvio DaidoneRamón LópezErdgin ManeKostas G. StamoulisSumeet GulatiWilliam FosterJorge OrtegaAlberto Valdés
- Topics
- Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets (8 papers)Economic Growth and Productivity (5 papers)Land Rights and Reforms (5 papers)
- Cited by
- General Agricultural and Biological SciencesSoil ScienceBusiness and International Management
- Partner nations
- ChileItalyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Gustavo Anríquez
24 papers receiving 442 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Economics and Econometrics 185
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 120
- Soil Science 95
- Sociology and Political Science 70
- General Health Professions 53
Countries citing papers authored by Gustavo Anríquez
This map shows the geographic impact of Gustavo Anríquez's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gustavo Anríquez with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gustavo Anríquez more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gustavo Anríquez
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gustavo Anríquez. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gustavo Anríquez. The network helps show where Gustavo Anríquez may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gustavo Anríquez
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gustavo Anríquez. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gustavo Anríquez based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gustavo Anríquez. Gustavo Anríquez is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 34 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | 74 | |
| 13 | 31 | |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 30 | |
| 16 | 32 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 14 | |
| 19 | 10 | |
| 20 | Convergencia de producto e ingreso de las regiones de Chile: una interpretación | 1 |
About Gustavo Anríquez
Gustavo Anríquez is a scholar working on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Soil Science and Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management, having authored 31 papers that have together received 488 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets (8 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (5 papers) and Land Rights and Reforms (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (120 citations), Soil Science (95 citations) and Business and International Management (18 citations). Gustavo Anríquez has collaborated with scholars based in Chile, Italy and United States. Frequent co-authors include Silvio Daidone, Ramón López, Erdgin Mane, Kostas G. Stamoulis, Sumeet Gulati, William Foster, Jorge Ortega, Alberto Valdés, Benjamin Davis and Alberto Valdés. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Sustainability and Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.