Gustave Le Bon
- Sociology and Political Science
- Political Science and International Relations
- Social Psychology
- Clinical Psychology
- Communication
- Co-authors
- José Luis Monereo Pérez
- Topics
- Education, sociology, and vocational training (2 papers)French Urban and Social Studies (2 papers)Historical and Literary Studies (2 papers)
- Journals
- The Journal of Portfolio ManagementRePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsMedical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
Gustave Le Bon
13 papers receiving 137 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Sociology and Political Science 107
- Political Science and International Relations 29
- Social Psychology 27
- Clinical Psychology 23
- Communication 15
Countries citing papers authored by Gustave Le Bon
This map shows the geographic impact of Gustave Le Bon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gustave Le Bon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gustave Le Bon more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gustave Le Bon
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gustave Le Bon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gustave Le Bon. The network helps show where Gustave Le Bon may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gustave Le Bon
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gustave Le Bon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gustave Le Bon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gustave Le Bon. Gustave Le Bon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | Psychology of the Great War: The First World War and Its Origins | 2 |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | Premières conséquences de la Guerre, transformation mentale des peuples | 0 |
| 7 | Psicología de las multitudes | 3 |
| 8 | The Psychology of the Great War | 0 |
| 9 | 19 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 0 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 92 | |
| 17 | L'équitation actuelle et ses principes | 1 |
| 18 | Psicología de las masas | 19 |
| 19 | The world of Islamic civilization | 3 |
| 20 | Psychologie der Massen | 48 |
About Gustave Le Bon
Gustave Le Bon is a scholar working on General Psychology, Anthropology and Urban Studies, having authored 25 papers that have together received 203 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Education, sociology, and vocational training (2 papers), French Urban and Social Studies (2 papers) and Historical and Literary Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (9 citations), Sociology and Political Science (107 citations) and Life-span and Life-course Studies (2 citations). Gustave Le Bon has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and France. Frequent co-authors include José Luis Monereo Pérez. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Portfolio Management, RePEc: Research Papers in Economics and Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.