Gustav Herglotz
-
- Mechanics and Biomechanics Studies 1
-
- History and Theory of Mathematics 1
-
- Relativity and Gravitational Theory 1
In The Last Decade
Gustav Herglotz
2 papers receiving 13 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 14
- Numerical Analysis 3
- Mathematical Physics 4
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 4
- Mechanics of Materials 6
- Applied Mathematics 2
Countries citing papers authored by Gustav Herglotz
This map shows the geographic impact of Gustav Herglotz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gustav Herglotz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gustav Herglotz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gustav Herglotz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gustav Herglotz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gustav Herglotz. The network helps show where Gustav Herglotz may publish in the future.
No co-authors to show.
All Works
About Gustav Herglotz
Gustav Herglotz is a scholar working on Theoretical Computer Science, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 2 papers that have together received 16 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mechanics and Biomechanics Studies (1 paper), History and Theory of Mathematics (1 paper) and Relativity and Gravitational Theory (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Numerical Analysis (3 citations), Mathematical Physics (4 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (4 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.