Guilhem Poy
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials top 10%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Computer Networks and Communications top 10%
- Mechanical Engineering
- Materials Chemistry
- Co-authors
- Patrick OswaldS. ŽumerP. OswaldAlain DequidtInge NysIvan I. SmalyukhJordi Ignés‐MullolJeroen Beeckman
- Topics
- Liquid Crystal Research Advancements (19 papers)Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation (12 papers)Material Dynamics and Properties (5 papers)
- Cited by
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic MaterialsAcoustics and UltrasonicsCondensed Matter Physics
- Partner nations
- FranceSloveniaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Guilhem Poy
23 papers receiving 370 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 249
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 127
- Computer Networks and Communications 98
- Mechanical Engineering 69
- Materials Chemistry 67
Countries citing papers authored by Guilhem Poy
This map shows the geographic impact of Guilhem Poy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Guilhem Poy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Guilhem Poy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Guilhem Poy
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Guilhem Poy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Guilhem Poy. The network helps show where Guilhem Poy may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Guilhem Poy
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Guilhem Poy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Guilhem Poy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Guilhem Poy. Guilhem Poy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 37 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 17 | |
| 7 | 22 | |
| 8 | 21 | |
| 9 | 38 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 19 | |
| 16 | 33 | |
| 17 | 19 | |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 11 | |
| 20 | 18 |
About Guilhem Poy
Guilhem Poy is a scholar working on Acoustics and Ultrasonics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 24 papers that have together received 372 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Liquid Crystal Research Advancements (19 papers), Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation (12 papers) and Material Dynamics and Properties (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (249 citations), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (7 citations) and Condensed Matter Physics (52 citations). Guilhem Poy has collaborated with scholars based in France, Slovenia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Patrick Oswald, S. Žumer, P. Oswald, Alain Dequidt, Inge Nys, Ivan I. Smalyukh, Jordi Ignés‐Mullol, Jeroen Beeckman, Elena Blanco and M. Paul. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Nature Photonics and Optics Express.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.