Grigore Pop-Elecheș

40 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Grigore Pop-Elecheș
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Political Science and International Relations 1.1k
  • Sociology and Political Science 848
  • Economics and Econometrics 180
  • Strategy and Management 122
  • Development 114
Replace Timothy Frye with:
Timothy Frye United States
Henry E. Hale United States
Jessica Weeks United States
M. Steven Fish United States
Mark R. Beissinger United States
Anna Lührmann Sweden
Erica Frantz United States
Graeme B. Robertson United States
Xavier Coller Spain
Juliet Kaarbo United Kingdom
Grigore Pop-Elecheș relative to Timothy Frye United States Timothy Frye's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Timothy Frye · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Grigore Pop-Elecheș

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Grigore Pop-Elecheș's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Grigore Pop-Elecheș with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Grigore Pop-Elecheș more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Grigore Pop-Elecheș

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Grigore Pop-Elecheș. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Grigore Pop-Elecheș. The network helps show where Grigore Pop-Elecheș may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Grigore Pop-Elecheș

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Grigore Pop-Elecheș. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Grigore Pop-Elecheș based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Grigore Pop-Elecheș. Grigore Pop-Elecheș is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 13
3 48
4 9
5 10
6 0
7 28
8 12
9 77
10
Post-communist legacies and political behavior and attitudes
8
11 66
12 24
13 27
14 41
15 15
16 145
17
Voting More When it Matters More:The Surprisingly Rational Turnout Story in Post-Communist Countries
1
18 18
19
Whither Democracy? The Politics of Dejection in the 2000 Romanian Elections
0
20 15

About Grigore Pop-Elecheș

Grigore Pop-Elecheș is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Development and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 45 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (18 papers), Political Conflict and Governance (15 papers) and Religion and Society Interactions (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (1.1k citations), Development (114 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (848 citations). Grigore Pop-Elecheș has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Joshua A. Tucker, Graeme B. Robertson, Alexander C. Pacek, Cristian Pop‐Eleches, Anja Neundorf, Michael Donnelly, Keena Lipsitz, Thad Dunning, Lucan A. Way and Giovanni Capoccia. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, American Journal of Political Science and The Journal of Politics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026