Griet Emonds

429 total citations
6 papers, 317 citations indexed

About

Griet Emonds is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Griet Emonds has authored 6 papers receiving a total of 317 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 2 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Griet Emonds's work include Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (3 papers) and Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (2 papers). Griet Emonds is often cited by papers focused on Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (3 papers) and Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (2 papers). Griet Emonds collaborates with scholars based in Belgium, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Griet Emonds's co-authors include Christophe Boone, Carolyn H. Declerck, Paul M. Parizel, E. Vandervliet, Ruth Seurinck, Rik Achten, Wim Van Hecke, Johan Van Goethem, Alexander Leemans and Jan Sijbers and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Brain and Cognition and Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience.

In The Last Decade

Griet Emonds

6 papers receiving 303 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Griet Emonds Belgium	6	144	104	78	66	65	6	317
Anna Stone United Kingdom	14	164 1.1×	60 0.6×	63 0.8×	86 1.3×	23 0.4×	38	431
Michelle Jin Yee Neoh Singapore	11	73 0.5×	93 0.9×	58 0.7×	55 0.8×	8 0.1×	30	372
Yuko Sato Sweden	8	205 1.4×	138 1.3×	26 0.3×	30 0.5×	6 0.1×	22	526
Marleen J. Janssen Netherlands	12	91 0.6×	99 1.0×	46 0.6×	27 0.4×	38 0.6×	46	500
Noriko Coburn United States	3	165 1.1×	78 0.8×	88 1.1×	117 1.8×	9 0.1×	3	409
Laura Klaming Netherlands	10	132 0.9×	37 0.4×	22 0.3×	20 0.3×	10 0.2×	22	298
Sarah Gotowiec Australia	7	127 0.9×	36 0.3×	48 0.6×	30 0.5×	5 0.1×	9	251
Alan J. Koenig United States	14	179 1.2×	40 0.4×	41 0.5×	14 0.2×	60 0.9×	36	467
Ran Tao China	14	263 1.8×	125 1.2×	37 0.5×	108 1.6×	5 0.1×	32	470
Katherine Hill United States	10	41 0.3×	44 0.4×	61 0.8×	66 1.0×	13 0.2×	25	305

Countries citing papers authored by Griet Emonds

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Griet Emonds's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Griet Emonds with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Griet Emonds more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Griet Emonds

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Griet Emonds. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Griet Emonds. The network helps show where Griet Emonds may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Griet Emonds

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Griet Emonds. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Griet Emonds based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Griet Emonds. Griet Emonds is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

6 of 6 papers shown

1.

Declerck, Carolyn H., et al.. (2016). Trust as commodity: social value orientation affects the neural substrates of learning to cooperate. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 12(4). 609–617. 22 indexed citations

2.

Emonds, Griet, Carolyn H. Declerck, Christophe Boone, Ruth Seurinck, & Rik Achten. (2013). Establishing cooperation in a mixed-motive social dilemma. An fMRI study investigating the role of social value orientation and dispositional trust. Social Neuroscience. 9(1). 10–22. 41 indexed citations

3.

Emonds, Griet, Carolyn H. Declerck, Christophe Boone, E. Vandervliet, & Paul M. Parizel. (2012). The cognitive demands on cooperation in social dilemmas: An fMRI study. Social Neuroscience. 7(5). 494–509. 26 indexed citations

4.

Declerck, Carolyn H., Christophe Boone, & Griet Emonds. (2012). When do people cooperate? The neuroeconomics of prosocial decision making. Brain and Cognition. 81(1). 95–117. 134 indexed citations

5.

Emonds, Griet, Carolyn H. Declerck, Christophe Boone, E. Vandervliet, & Paul M. Parizel. (2010). Comparing the neural basis of decision making in social dilemmas of people with different social value orientations, a fMRI study.. Journal of Neuroscience Psychology and Economics. 4(1). 11–24. 44 indexed citations

6.

Hecke, Wim Van, Guy Nagels, Griet Emonds, et al.. (2009). A diffusion tensor imaging group study of the spinal cord in multiple sclerosis patients with and without T₂ spinal cord lesions. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 30(1). 25–34. 50 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact