Gregg Foster

1.1k total citations
10 papers, 729 citations indexed

About

Gregg Foster is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Social Psychology and Human-Computer Interaction. According to data from OpenAlex, Gregg Foster has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 729 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 3 papers in Social Psychology and 3 papers in Human-Computer Interaction. Recurrent topics in Gregg Foster's work include Team Dynamics and Performance (3 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (3 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (2 papers). Gregg Foster is often cited by papers focused on Team Dynamics and Performance (3 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (3 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (2 papers). Gregg Foster collaborates with scholars based in United States and Australia. Gregg Foster's co-authors include Daniel G. Bobrow, Deborah Tatar, Mark Stefik, Ken Kahn and Lucy Suchman and has published in prestigious journals such as Communications of the ACM, ACM Transactions on Information Systems and International Journal of Man-Machine Studies.

In The Last Decade

Gregg Foster

10 papers receiving 605 citations

Peers

Gregg Foster
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Human-Computer Interaction 453
  • Information Systems and Management 169
  • Social Psychology 154
  • Information Systems 131
  • Computer Networks and Communications 130
Replace Kenneth R. Grant with:
Kenneth R. Grant United States
Kum‐Yew Lai United States
Philip L. Isenhour United States
Donald L. McCracken United States
John Mariani United Kingdom
Ralph D. Hill Canada
Joe Tullio United States
Alison Kidd United Kingdom
Gavin Jancke United States
Jörg Hannemann Germany
Kenneth R. Grant United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Gregg Foster
Gregg Foster · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Gregg Foster
Gregg Foster · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Gregg Foster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gregg Foster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gregg Foster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gregg Foster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gregg Foster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gregg Foster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gregg Foster. The network helps show where Gregg Foster may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gregg Foster

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gregg Foster. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gregg Foster based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gregg Foster. Gregg Foster is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 3
2 144
3 40
4 380
5 54
6 91
7
Collaborative Systems and Multi-user Interfaces
8
8 1
9
User Interface Considerations for Algebraic Manipulation Systems
3
10
DREAMS: Display Representation of Algebraic Manipulation Systems
5

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026