Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
XAI—Explainable artificial intelligence
20191.1k citationsDavid Gunning, Mark Stefik et al.Science Roboticsprofile →
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Stefik's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Stefik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Stefik more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Stefik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Stefik. The network helps show where Mark Stefik may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Stefik
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Stefik.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Stefik based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Stefik. Mark Stefik is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gunning, David, Mark Stefik, Jaesik Choi, et al.. (2019). XAI—Explainable artificial intelligence. Science Robotics. 4(37).1145 indexed citations breakdown →
2.
Santini, Simone, et al.. (2003). In DRM, Rethink Business Practices, not Just Technology and the Law. Communications of the ACM. 46(6). 11–13.2 indexed citations
3.
Stefik, Mark. (1999). The internet edge : social, legal, and technological challenges for a networked world. MIT Press eBooks.9 indexed citations
4.
Stefik, Mark. (1999). The Internet Edge: Social, Technical, and Legal Challenges for a Networked World. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 1.9 indexed citations
5.
Stefik, Mark & Vinton G. Cerf. (1996). Internet Dreams: Archetypes, Myths, and Metophors for Inventing the Net. MIT Press eBooks.1 indexed citations
Clancey, William J., Stephen W. Smoliar, & Mark Stefik. (1994). Contemplating Minds: A Forum for Artificial Intelligence. MIT Press eBooks.9 indexed citations
8.
Russell, Daniel M., Mark Stefik, Peter Pirolli, & Stuart K. Card. (1993). The cost structure of sensemaking. 269–276.498 indexed citations
9.
Stefik, Mark, Daniel G. Bobrow, & Ken Kahn. (1989). Integrating access-oriented programming into a multiparadigm environment. Ablex Publishing Corp. eBooks. 47–63.5 indexed citations
10.
Stefik, Mark & Daniel G. Bobrow. (1989). Object-oriented programming: themes and variations. Ablex Publishing Corp. eBooks. 3–45.50 indexed citations
11.
Stefik, Mark, et al.. (1989). Towards the principled engineering of knowledge. 135–147.4 indexed citations
Stefik, Mark. (1979). An examination of a frame-structured representation system. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 845–852.50 indexed citations
20.
Martin, Nancy, Peter Friedland, Jonathan J. King, & Mark Stefik. (1977). Knowledge base management for experiment planning in molecular genetics. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 882–887.13 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.