Greg Treston

806 citations
12 papers · 543 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Greg Treston

12 papers receiving 520 citations

Peers

Greg Treston
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 394
  • Developmental Neuroscience 216
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 199
  • Paleontology 46
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 127
Replace Thomas Sherwin with:
Thomas Sherwin United States
Mary Rabb United States
Maria Cristina Mondardini Italy
Martin S. Bogetz United States
LaVone E. Simmons United States
A. E. E. Meursing Netherlands
T. W. OGG United Kingdom
Pervin Bozkurt Türkiye
Pauline M. Cullen United Kingdom
Greg Treston relative to Thomas Sherwin United States Thomas Sherwin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
Thomas Sherwin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Greg Treston

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Greg Treston's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Greg Treston with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Greg Treston more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Greg Treston

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Greg Treston. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Greg Treston. The network helps show where Greg Treston may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Greg Treston, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Greg Treston Line = papers co-authored together Greg Treston links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2009174
2 2009114
3 200467
4 200158
5 201636
6 200729
7 200924
8 200516
9 200715
10 20078
11
What Is The TCI Dose Required When Using Propofol For Conscious Sedation During Dental Procedures? : A Retrospective Study
20141
12 20171

About Greg Treston

Greg Treston is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Developmental Neuroscience, Surgery and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 12 papers that have together received 543 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (9 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (7 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (4 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (4 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (2 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (2 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (1 paper) and Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (394 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (216 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (199 citations), Paleontology (46 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (127 citations). Greg Treston has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include R McGlone, Michele R. McKee, Baruch Krauss, Lance Brown, Andreas Gerber, Dewesh Agrawal, Joseph D. Losek, Raymond D. Pitetti, Mark A. Hostetler and Markus Weiß. Their work appears in journals such as Emergency Medicine Australasia, Annals of Emergency Medicine, The Medical Journal of Australia, Emergency Medicine and The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact