Greg English‐Loeb
- Insect Science top 1%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 2%
- Plant Science top 5%
- Ecology top 10%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 10%
- Co-authors
- Andrew P. NortonMarc RhaindsRobert C. SeemDavid M. GadouryTimothy E. MartinsonWayne F. WilcoxTodd A. UgineM. Andrew Walker
- Topics
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (21 papers)Plant and animal studies (8 papers)Berry genetics and cultivation research (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Greg English‐Loeb
24 papers receiving 640 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- Insect Science 526
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 435
- Plant Science 381
- Ecology 123
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 90
Countries citing papers authored by Greg English‐Loeb
This map shows the geographic impact of Greg English‐Loeb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Greg English‐Loeb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Greg English‐Loeb more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Greg English‐Loeb
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Greg English‐Loeb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Greg English‐Loeb. The network helps show where Greg English‐Loeb may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Greg English‐Loeb
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Greg English‐Loeb. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Greg English‐Loeb based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Greg English‐Loeb. Greg English‐Loeb is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 26 | |
| 2 | 17 | |
| 3 | 17 | |
| 4 | Economic Impact of the Two-Spotted Spider Mites (Tetranychus Urticae) on Strawberries Grown as a Perennial | 0 |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 80 | |
| 7 | 79 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 44 | |
| 10 | 25 | |
| 11 | 23 | |
| 12 | 110 | |
| 13 | 28 | |
| 14 | 70 | |
| 15 | 12 | |
| 16 | 11 | |
| 17 | 17 | |
| 18 | 17 | |
| 19 | 12 | |
| 20 | Testing the Efficacy of Mycotrol ES, Beauveria bassiana, on Tarnished Plant Bugs, Lygus lineolaris, in New York Strawberries 1997 | 1 |
About Greg English‐Loeb
Greg English‐Loeb is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Plant Science, having authored 26 papers that have together received 706 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (21 papers), Plant and animal studies (8 papers) and Berry genetics and cultivation research (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (526 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (435 citations) and Plant Science (381 citations). Greg English‐Loeb has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Andrew P. Norton, Marc Rhainds, Robert C. Seem, David M. Gadoury, Timothy E. Martinson, Wayne F. Wilcox, Todd A. Ugine, M. Andrew Walker, Marvin P. Pritts and Livy Williams. Their work appears in journals such as Ecology, Oecologia and Ecological Applications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.