M. A. Easterbrook

1.5k total citations
40 papers, 849 citations indexed

About

M. A. Easterbrook is a scholar working on Insect Science, Plant Science and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, M. A. Easterbrook has authored 40 papers receiving a total of 849 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 34 papers in Insect Science, 25 papers in Plant Science and 14 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in M. A. Easterbrook's work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (31 papers), Berry genetics and cultivation research (19 papers) and Forest Insect Ecology and Management (11 papers). M. A. Easterbrook is often cited by papers focused on Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (31 papers), Berry genetics and cultivation research (19 papers) and Forest Insect Ecology and Management (11 papers). M. A. Easterbrook collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. M. A. Easterbrook's co-authors include M. G. Solomon, J. Fitzgerald, J. V. Cross, Chantelle Jay, J. E. Cranham, Angela M. Crook, Xiangming Xu, D. W. Simpson, Damon J. Crook and P. J. Innocenzi and has published in prestigious journals such as Crop Protection, Annals of Applied Biology and Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata.

In The Last Decade

M. A. Easterbrook

40 papers receiving 758 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
M. A. Easterbrook United Kingdom 18 749 378 362 156 79 40 849
James H. Lashomb United States 15 570 0.8× 392 1.0× 317 0.9× 138 0.9× 130 1.6× 44 728
Arthur M. Agnello United States 14 474 0.6× 202 0.5× 153 0.4× 128 0.8× 43 0.5× 44 562
K. L. Robb United States 14 603 0.8× 470 1.2× 211 0.6× 68 0.4× 125 1.6× 27 720
Phil A. Phillips United States 19 871 1.2× 546 1.4× 383 1.1× 125 0.8× 69 0.9× 50 1.0k
G. Viggiani Italy 17 997 1.3× 399 1.1× 617 1.7× 189 1.2× 153 1.9× 133 1.2k
Steven R. Alm United States 16 581 0.8× 355 0.9× 130 0.4× 137 0.9× 148 1.9× 49 733
Greg English‐Loeb United States 14 526 0.7× 381 1.0× 435 1.2× 123 0.8× 40 0.5× 26 706
Michelle T. Fountain United Kingdom 16 599 0.8× 322 0.9× 341 0.9× 143 0.9× 61 0.8× 58 734
H. W. Browning United States 16 655 0.9× 382 1.0× 222 0.6× 119 0.8× 198 2.5× 49 787
Todd A. Ugine United States 16 660 0.9× 395 1.0× 188 0.5× 159 1.0× 226 2.9× 49 777

Countries citing papers authored by M. A. Easterbrook

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. A. Easterbrook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. A. Easterbrook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. A. Easterbrook more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. A. Easterbrook

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. A. Easterbrook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. A. Easterbrook. The network helps show where M. A. Easterbrook may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. A. Easterbrook

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. A. Easterbrook. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. A. Easterbrook based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. A. Easterbrook. M. A. Easterbrook is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Fitzgerald, J., et al.. (2008). The spatial and temporal distribution of predatory and phytophagous mites in field-grown strawberry in the UK. Experimental and Applied Acarology. 44(4). 293–306. 19 indexed citations
2.
Fitzgerald, J., et al.. (2007). Interactions among phytophagous mites, and introduced and naturally occurring predatory mites, on strawberry in the UK. Experimental and Applied Acarology. 43(1). 33–47. 21 indexed citations
3.
Easterbrook, M. A.. (2004). The beneficial fauna of strawberry fields in south-east England. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology. 79(1). 137–144. 9 indexed citations
4.
Simpson, D. W., et al.. (2002). The inheritance of resistance to the blossom weevil, Anthonomus rubi, in the cultivated strawberry, Fragaria×ananassa. Plant Breeding. 121(1). 72–75. 3 indexed citations
5.
Easterbrook, M. A., J. Fitzgerald, & M. G. Solomon. (2001). Biological control of strawberry tarsonemid mite Phytonemus pallidus and two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae on strawberry in the UK using species of Neoseiulus (Amblyseius) (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Experimental and Applied Acarology. 25(1). 25–36. 111 indexed citations
6.
Easterbrook, M. A. & D. W. Simpson. (2000). Susceptibility of everbearing cultivars of strawberry to the European tarnished plant bug,Lygus rugulipennis. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology. 75(4). 405–408. 6 indexed citations
8.
Easterbrook, M. A., et al.. (1999). Assessment of trap plants to regulate numbers of the European tarnished plant bug, Lygus rugulipennis, on late‐season strawberries. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata. 92(2). 119–125. 24 indexed citations
9.
Simpson, D. W., et al.. (1997). RESISTANCE TO ANTHONOMUS RUBI IN THE CULTIVATED STRAWBERRY. Acta Horticulturae. 211–216. 12 indexed citations
10.
Moorhouse, E. R., M. A. Easterbrook, A. T. Gillespie, & A.K. Charnley. (1993). Control ofOtiorhynchus sulcatus(Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) Larvae on a Range of Hardy Ornamental Nursery Stock Species Using the Entomogenous FungusMetarhizium anisopliae. Biocontrol Science and Technology. 3(1). 63–72. 24 indexed citations
11.
Easterbrook, M. A.. (1992). The possibilities for control of two‐spotted spider miteTetranychus urticaeon field‐grown strawberries in the UK by predatory mites. Biocontrol Science and Technology. 2(3). 235–245. 24 indexed citations
12.
Easterbrook, M. A., et al.. (1992). Control of the black vine weevil,otiorhynchus sulcatus, with the fungusmetarhizium anisopliae. Phytoparasitica. 20(S1). S17–S19. 4 indexed citations
13.
James, D. J., et al.. (1992). Transgenes for Pest and Disease Resistance. Phytoparasitica. 20(S1). S83–S87. 10 indexed citations
14.
Easterbrook, M. A.. (1991). Species of thrips associated with flowers of late-flowering strawberries. 5 indexed citations
15.
Solomon, M. G., J. E. Cranham, M. A. Easterbrook, & J. Fitzgerald. (1989). Control of the pear psyllid, Cacopsylla pyricola, in South East England by predators and pesticides. Crop Protection. 8(3). 197–205. 33 indexed citations
16.
Easterbrook, M. A., M. G. Solomon, & J. Fitzgerald. (1985). Control ofBlastobasis decolorella(Lepidoptera: Blastobasidae), a new pest of apple. Journal of Horticultural Science. 60(1). 33–36. 1 indexed citations
17.
Easterbrook, M. A., et al.. (1980). Trials on integrated pest management in English apple orchards.. 61–67. 8 indexed citations
18.
Easterbrook, M. A.. (1980). The host range of a ‘non-gall-forming’ eriophyid mite living in buds onRibes. Journal of Horticultural Science. 55(1). 1–6. 8 indexed citations
19.
Easterbrook, M. A.. (1978). The life‐history and bionomics of Epitrimerus piri (Acarina: Eriophyidae) on pear. Annals of Applied Biology. 88(1). 13–22. 25 indexed citations
20.
Easterbrook, M. A., et al.. (1972). Chemicals Tested for Control of Black Currant Gall Mite,Cecidophyopsis Ribis(Westw.). Journal of Horticultural Science. 47(4). 535–539. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026