Grace Yao

97 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Peers

Grace Yao
Comparison fields: 5 of 173
  • Health 307
  • Applied Psychology 181
  • Rehabilitation 231
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 502
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 401
Replace Maria Orlando Edelen with:
Maria Orlando Edelen United States
Kavita Vedhara United Kingdom
Thomas W. Teasdale Denmark
Everett V. Smith United States
Cindy Cooper United Kingdom
Anders Kottorp Sweden
David Hevey Ireland
Larry H. Ludlow United States
Elias Mpofu United States
Nahathai Wongpakaran Thailand
Grace Yao relative to Maria Orlando Edelen United States Maria Orlando Edelen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Maria Orlando Edelen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Grace Yao

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Grace Yao's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Grace Yao with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Grace Yao more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Grace Yao

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Grace Yao. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Grace Yao. The network helps show where Grace Yao may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Grace Yao, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Grace Yao Line = papers co-authored together Grace Yao links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 101 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Development and verification of validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF Taiwan version.
2002431
2 1993218
3 2008204
4 2008127
5 2006119
6 2004116
7 200688
8 200784
9 199881
10 201874
11 201769
12 201268
13 201362
14 200557
15 201454
16 201150
17 200648
18
Psychometric evaluation of the Taiwan version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire.
200446
19 200446
20 200645

About Grace Yao

Grace Yao is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Social Psychology, Applied Psychology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 101 papers that have together received 3.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (10 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (8 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (7 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (7 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (7 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (7 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (6 papers) and Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (307 citations), Applied Psychology (181 citations), Rehabilitation (231 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (502 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (401 citations). Grace Yao has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Chia‐Huei Wu, Jung‐Der Wang, Lloyd G. Humphreys, David Lubinski, Yiing Mei Liou, Li‐Chi Chiang, Lian‐Hua Huang, Ching‐Lin Hsieh, Mei‐Hui Tseng and Carol L. Gohm. Their work appears in journals such as Social Indicators Research, Quality of Life Research, Value in Health, PLoS ONE and Planta.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact