Gordon Williams

1.3k citations
23 papers · 346 indexed · h-index 9

Impact in

    • Classical Antiquity Studies
    • Historical and Literary Studies
  • Classics top 5%
    • Medieval Literature and History
    • Byzantine Studies and History

Papers in

Gordon Williams

19 papers receiving 182 citations

Peers

Gordon Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Anthropology 222
  • Classics 42
  • Archeology 77
  • Philosophy 75
  • Literature and Literary Theory 47
Replace Aristophanes with:
Aristophanes
Douglas E. Gerber Mexico
William S. Anderson United States
Anthony J. Podlecki Canada
Erich Segal
Wayne B. Ingalls Canada
Nicolas P. Gross United States
Frederick M. Combellack
P. E. Easterling United Kingdom
Frederick Ahl United States
Gordon Williams relative to Aristophanes Aristophanes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Aristophanes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gordon Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gordon Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gordon Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gordon Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gordon Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gordon Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gordon Williams. The network helps show where Gordon Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Gordon Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gordon Williams Line = papers co-authored together Gordon Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20030
2 19976
3
A Glossary of Shakespeare's Sexual Language
199721
4
Shakespeare, sex and the print revolution
19963
5 19908
6 198711
7 19871
8 19845
9 198343
10 19830
11 19823
12 19824
13 198038
14 1971118
15
The nature of Roman poetry
19704
16 196926
17 196213
18 19591
19
Evidence for Plautus' Workmanship in the Miles Gloriosus
19581
20 195835

About Gordon Williams

Gordon Williams is a scholar working on Anthropology, Literature and Literary Theory, History, Classics and Statistics and Probability, having authored 23 papers that have together received 346 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (9 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (4 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (1 paper), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (1 paper), Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications (1 paper), Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models (1 paper), Classical Studies and Legal History (1 paper) and Classical Philosophy and Thought (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (222 citations), Classics (42 citations), Archeology (77 citations), Philosophy (75 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (47 citations). Gordon Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Brooks Otis, James H. Dee, James E. G. Zetzel, Horace, Z. N. Zakov, Gail Kern Paster, Gerald J. Beck, Yinsheng Qu, John J. Winkler and Sarah Forsythe. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Philology, The Classical World, The Journal of Roman Studies, The Modern Language Review and Anesthesiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026