Brooks Otis

1.5k citations
17 papers · 438 indexed · h-index 9

Impact in

    • Classical Antiquity Studies
    • Historical and Literary Studies
  • Classics top 2%
    • Medieval Literature and History
    • Byzantine Studies and History

Papers in

Brooks Otis

15 papers receiving 234 citations

Peers

Brooks Otis
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
  • Anthropology 319
  • Classics 63
  • Archeology 111
  • Philosophy 108
  • Religious studies 28
Replace Erich Segal with:
Erich Segal
R. G. M. Nisbet United States
Frederick M. Combellack
Gordon Williams United States
K. J. Dover United Kingdom
Douglas E. Gerber Mexico
Georg Luck United States
William S. Anderson United States
Anthony J. Podlecki Canada
G. Karl Galinsky
Brooks Otis relative to Erich Segal Erich Segal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Erich Segal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Brooks Otis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brooks Otis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brooks Otis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brooks Otis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brooks Otis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brooks Otis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brooks Otis. The network helps show where Brooks Otis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Brooks Otis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Brooks Otis Line = papers co-authored together Brooks Otis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1
L'Agamemnon d'Eschyle. Le texte et ses interpretationsL'Agamemnon d'Eschyle. Le texte et ses interpretations 1, i. Prologue. Parodos anapestique. Parodos Lyrique 1L'Agamemnon d'Eschyle. Le texte et ses interpretations 1, ii. Parodos Lyrique 2-3. Presentation du premier episode. Premier stasimon. IndexCosmos and Tragedy: An Essay on the Meaning of AeschylusOn the Hymn to Zeus in Aeschylus' Agamemnon
19832
2 19722
3 1971118
4 196823
5
Ovid as an Epic Poet
196679
6 19661
7 196514
8 196519
9 196597
10 19658
11 196429
12
The Unity of the Seven against Thebes
19604
13 19602
14 19594
15 195815
16 195816
17 19535

About Brooks Otis

Brooks Otis is a scholar working on Anthropology, Classics, Religious studies, Archeology and Organic Chemistry, having authored 17 papers that have together received 438 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (8 papers), Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods (3 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (1 paper), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (1 paper), Classical Philosophy and Thought (1 paper), Historical and Literary Analyses (1 paper), Byzantine Studies and History (1 paper) and Biblical Studies and Interpretation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (319 citations), Classics (63 citations), Archeology (111 citations), Philosophy (108 citations) and Religious studies (28 citations). Frequent co-authors include Gordon Williams, George E. Duckworth, John Ε. Rexine, Frank O. Copley, Wilhelm Kamlah, Jean Bollack, Pam Smith and Aeschylus. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Philology, Phoenix, The Classical World, Greek, Roman and Byzantine studies and Harvard Studies in Classical Philology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026