Glen R. Hood
- Insect Science top 1%
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control 31
- Insect behavior and control techniques 29
- Insect and Pesticide Research 9
-
- Plant and animal studies 34
- Hymenoptera taxonomy and phylogeny 18
- Ecology top 5%
- Forest Insect Ecology and Management 30
- Horticulture top 10%
- Genetics top 10%
- Genetic diversity and population structure 9
- Evolution and Genetic Dynamics 6
- Co-authors
- Jeffrey L. FederScott P. EganJames R. OttThomas H. Q. PowellAndrew A. ForbesPatrik NosilGregory J. RaglandMeredith M. Doellman
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (1 paper)PLoS ONE (1 paper)Current Biology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Glen R. Hood
67 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Insect Science 698
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 656
- Ecology 504
- Horticulture 12
- Genetics 321
Countries citing papers authored by Glen R. Hood
This map shows the geographic impact of Glen R. Hood's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Glen R. Hood with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Glen R. Hood more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Glen R. Hood
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Glen R. Hood. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Glen R. Hood. The network helps show where Glen R. Hood may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Glen R. Hood, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 28 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 15 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 24 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 21 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 8 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 12 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 9 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 97 | |
| 17 | 2015 | 10 | |
| 18 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2013 | 45 | |
| 20 | 2011 | 17 |
About Glen R. Hood
Glen R. Hood is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Ecology, having authored 68 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (34 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (31 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (30 papers), Insect behavior and control techniques (29 papers), Hymenoptera taxonomy and phylogeny (18 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (9 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (9 papers) and Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (698 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (656 citations) and Ecology (504 citations). Glen R. Hood has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey L. Feder, Scott P. Egan, James R. Ott, Thomas H. Q. Powell, Andrew A. Forbes, Patrik Nosil, Gregory J. Ragland, Meredith M. Doellman, James J. Smith and Linyi Zhang. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, PLoS ONE and Current Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.