H. Dong

1.7k total citations
69 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

H. Dong is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, H. Dong has authored 69 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 62 papers in Insect Science, 29 papers in Ecology and 28 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in H. Dong's work include Insect behavior and control techniques (45 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (28 papers) and Insect and Pesticide Research (24 papers). H. Dong is often cited by papers focused on Insect behavior and control techniques (45 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (28 papers) and Insect and Pesticide Research (24 papers). H. Dong collaborates with scholars based in United States, South Korea and China. H. Dong's co-authors include Gregory M. Loeb, Peter J. Landolt, Todd Adams, Charles E. Linn, Helmuth Rogg, Stephen P. Hesler, Anna Wallingford, Jeffrey L. Feder, Wendell L. Roelofs and Thomas H. Q. Powell and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and Evolution.

In The Last Decade

H. Dong

66 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
H. Dong United States 21 1.2k 624 493 259 106 69 1.3k
Hamzeh Izadi Iran 16 432 0.4× 300 0.5× 178 0.4× 139 0.5× 127 1.2× 72 653
N. Kirk Hillier Canada 20 849 0.7× 313 0.5× 212 0.4× 401 1.5× 416 3.9× 75 1.2k
L. Metspalu Estonia 16 545 0.5× 461 0.7× 191 0.4× 190 0.7× 180 1.7× 99 847
Vicente Navarro‐Llopis Spain 25 1.2k 1.0× 653 1.0× 246 0.5× 158 0.6× 82 0.8× 72 1.4k
Massimo Giorgini Italy 21 1.1k 0.9× 538 0.9× 243 0.5× 340 1.3× 94 0.9× 48 1.3k
Jérôme Niogret United States 18 649 0.6× 253 0.4× 532 1.1× 134 0.5× 78 0.7× 42 868
Yooichi Kainoh Japan 20 954 0.8× 437 0.7× 147 0.3× 569 2.2× 141 1.3× 97 1.2k
Jorge Toledo Mexico 22 1.4k 1.2× 578 0.9× 244 0.5× 208 0.8× 44 0.4× 100 1.5k
P. D. Greany United States 20 1.1k 0.9× 428 0.7× 276 0.6× 379 1.5× 99 0.9× 53 1.2k
Nicky G. Agelopoulos United Kingdom 9 563 0.5× 366 0.6× 87 0.2× 259 1.0× 47 0.4× 12 712

Countries citing papers authored by H. Dong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. Dong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. Dong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. Dong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. Dong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. Dong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. Dong. The network helps show where H. Dong may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of H. Dong

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of H. Dong. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of H. Dong based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with H. Dong. H. Dong is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Juzwik, Jennifer, Brandon E. McNellis, Douglass F. Jacobs, et al.. (2025). The In Vitro and In Vivo Fungal Volatile Organic Compounds Associated with Rapid ʻŌhiʻa Death and the Response of Xyleborine Ambrosia Beetles to those Compounds. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 51(3). 59–59.
2.
Zhu, Junwei, Amy Roda, Paul E. Kendra, et al.. (2024). Deterrence and behavioral mode of coconut oil‐derived free fatty acids on Zeugodacus cucurbitae oviposition. Insect Science. 32(4). 1403–1414. 2 indexed citations
3.
Dong, H., et al.. (2024). The efficacy of the semiochemical repellent verbenone to reduce ambrosia beetle attack on healthy and Ceratocystis-infested ‘ōhiʻa trees. Trees Forests and People. 18. 100735–100735. 2 indexed citations
4.
Hesler, Stephen P., et al.. (2024). Field Testing of 2‐Pentylfuran as a Behavioural Control Tool for Spotted‐Wing Drosophila in Raspberries. Journal of Applied Entomology. 149(2). 248–255. 1 indexed citations
5.
Kim, Dong‐Bin, et al.. (2024). Ethyl Formate Fumigation against Pineapple Mealybug, Dysmicoccus brevipes, a Quarantine Insect Pest of Pineapples. Insects. 15(1). 25–25. 1 indexed citations
7.
Kim, Dong‐Bin, et al.. (2023). Comparison of Methyl Bromide and Ethyl Formate for Fumigation of Snail and Fly Pests of Imported Orchids. Insects. 14(1). 66–66. 3 indexed citations
8.
Kendra, Paul E., et al.. (2023). Coconut oil derived five‐component synthetic oviposition deterrent for oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis. Pest Management Science. 79(10). 3852–3859. 5 indexed citations
10.
Valles, Steven M., et al.. (2023). RNA virus discoveries in the electric ant, Wasmannia auropunctata. Virus Genes. 59(2). 276–289. 2 indexed citations
11.
Meier, Linnea R., Stephen P. Hesler, Junwei Zhu, et al.. (2023). A 2-component blend of coconut oil-derived fatty acids as an oviposition deterrent against Drosophila suzukii (Drosophilidae: Diptera). Journal of Economic Entomology. 116(5). 1671–1678. 5 indexed citations
12.
Choi, Man‐Yeon, Hannah Lucas, Ramesh R. Sagili, H. Dong, & Jana C. Lee. (2018). Effect of Erythritol onDrosophila suzukii(Diptera: Drosophilidae) in the Presence of Naturally-Occurring Sugar Sources, and on the Survival ofApis mellifera(Hymenoptera: Apidae). Journal of Economic Entomology. 112(2). 981–985. 17 indexed citations
13.
Dong, H., Thomas H. Q. Powell, Jeffrey L. Feder, & Charles E. Linn. (2018). Identification of a New Blend of Host Fruit Volatiles from Red Downy Hawthorn, Crataegus mollis, Attractive to Rhagoletis pomonella Flies from the Northeastern United States. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 44(7-8). 671–680. 3 indexed citations
14.
Yee, Wee L., Robert B. Goughnour, Jeffrey L. Feder, Charles E. Linn, & H. Dong. (2017). Comparative Responses of Rhagoletis zephyria and Rhagoletis pomonella (Diptera: Tephritidae) to Commercial and Experimental Sticky Traps and Odors in Washington State. Environmental Entomology. 46(6). 1351–1358. 1 indexed citations
15.
Causton, Charlotte E., H. Dong, David Damiens, et al.. (2016). Darwin’s finches treat their feathers with a natural repellent. Scientific Reports. 6(1). 34559–34559. 30 indexed citations
16.
Dong, H., et al.. (2016). Identification and Optimization of Microbial Attractants for Philornis downsi, an Invasive Fly Parasitic on Galapagos Birds. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 42(11). 1101–1111. 16 indexed citations
17.
Linn, Charles E., Wee L. Yee, Sheina B. Sim, et al.. (2012). BEHAVIORAL EVIDENCE FOR FRUIT ODOR DISCRIMINATION AND SYMPATRIC HOST RACES OFRHAGOLETIS POMONELLAFLIES IN THE WESTERN UNITED STATES. Evolution. 66(11). 3632–3641. 26 indexed citations
19.
Dong, H., Thomas H. Q. Powell, Jeffrey L. Feder, & Charles E. Linn. (2011). Identification of Host Fruit Volatiles from Three Mayhaw Species (Crataegus Series Aestivales) Attractive to Mayhaw-Origin Rhagoletis pomonella Flies in the Southern United States. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 37(9). 961–73. 20 indexed citations
20.
Dong, H., Stephen P. Hesler, Satoshi Nojima, et al.. (2008). Flight Tunnel Responses of Female Grape Berry Moth (Paralobesia viteana) to Host Plants. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 34(5). 622–627. 25 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026