Giulia Poloni

443 citations
10 papers · 223 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Giulia Poloni

10 papers receiving 223 citations

Peers

Giulia Poloni
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 165
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 62
  • Cancer Research 25
  • Molecular Biology 79
  • Business and International Management 1
Replace Elisa Mastantuono with:
Elisa Mastantuono Germany
Wouter P. te Rijdt Netherlands
Jennifer Lynch United States
Dao Wu Wang China
Nihir Patel United States
Caroline Stanasiuk Germany
Martín Ortiz-Genga Spain
Kristen George Canada
L. M. Dorsch Netherlands
Paloma Jordà Spain
Giulia Poloni relative to Elisa Mastantuono Germany Elisa Mastantuono's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Elisa Mastantuono · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Giulia Poloni

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Giulia Poloni's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Giulia Poloni with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Giulia Poloni more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Giulia Poloni

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Giulia Poloni. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Giulia Poloni. The network helps show where Giulia Poloni may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Giulia Poloni, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Giulia Poloni Line = papers co-authored together Giulia Poloni links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 201847
2 201743
3 201439
4 201532
5 201715
6 201815
7 201612
8 202111
9 20198
10 20181

About Giulia Poloni

Giulia Poloni is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Molecular Biology, Health and Genetics, having authored 10 papers that have together received 223 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise (9 papers), Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies (6 papers), Sports injuries and prevention (4 papers), Viral Infections and Immunology Research (3 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (1 paper), Gun Ownership and Violence Research (1 paper), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (1 paper) and RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (165 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (62 citations), Cancer Research (25 citations), Molecular Biology (79 citations) and Business and International Management (1 citation). Giulia Poloni has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Martina Calore, Alessandra Rampazzo, Alessandra Lorenzon, Marzia De Bortoli, León J. De Windt, Paola Braghetta, Domenico Corrado, Ilaria Rigato, Mohsin A.F. Khan and Patrizia Sabatelli. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, European Journal of Human Genetics, Cells, Cell and Tissue Research and Oncotarget.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact