Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Marketing of commercial milk formula: a system to capture parents, communities, science, and policy
2023132 citationsGita Sen et al.The Lancetprofile →
The political economy of infant and young child feeding: confronting corporate power, overcoming structural barriers, and accelerating progress
202395 citationsGita Sen et al.The Lancetprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Gita Sen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gita Sen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gita Sen more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gita Sen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gita Sen. The network helps show where Gita Sen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gita Sen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gita Sen.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gita Sen based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Gita Sen. Gita Sen is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Östlin, Piroska, Ted Schrecker, Ritu Sadana, et al.. (2010). Priorities for research on equity and health: Implications for global and national priority setting and the role of WHO to take the health equity research agenda forward. Durham Research Online (Durham University).18 indexed citations
Iyer, Aditi, Asha George, & Gita Sen. (2007). Systematic Hierarchies and Systemic Failures. Economic and political weekly.1 indexed citations
14.
Sen, Gita, Aditi Iyer, & Asha George. (2007). Systematic Hierarchies and Systemic Failures Gender and Health Inequities in Koppal District. Economic and political weekly. 42(8). 682–690.20 indexed citations
15.
Sen, Gita, Asha George, & Piroska Östlin. (2005). Incorporar la perspectiva de género en la equidad en salud: un análisis de la investigación y las políticas.10 indexed citations
Sen, Gita. (2000). Gender Mainstreaming in Finance: A Reference Manual for Governments and Other Stakeholders. Medical Entomology and Zoology.10 indexed citations
Sen, Gita & Lourdes Benería. (1983). Desigualdades de clase y de género y el rol de la mujer en el desarrollo económico: implantaciones teóricas y prácticas. 17(15). 91–113.3 indexed citations
20.
Sen, Gita. (1983). Women's work and women agricultural labourers : a study of the Indian census. OpenDocs (Institute of Development Studies).2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.