Gisele Huf
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Infectious Diseases
- Epidemiology
- Emergency Medicine
- Co-authors
- Evandro Silva Freire CoutinhoClive E AdamsJacob AlexanderMichael H. AllenCláudia de Souza LopesSuely RozenfeldAfrânio Lineu KritskiLuciana Branco da Motta
- Topics
- Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (11 papers)Schizophrenia research and treatment (7 papers)Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- BrazilUnited KingdomFrance
In The Last Decade
Gisele Huf
27 papers receiving 461 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
- Clinical Psychology 273
- Psychiatry and Mental health 178
- Infectious Diseases 62
- Epidemiology 44
- Emergency Medicine 42
Countries citing papers authored by Gisele Huf
This map shows the geographic impact of Gisele Huf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gisele Huf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gisele Huf more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gisele Huf
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gisele Huf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gisele Huf. The network helps show where Gisele Huf may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gisele Huf
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gisele Huf. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gisele Huf based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gisele Huf. Gisele Huf is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | Adverse reactions to cosmetic products and the Notification System in Health Surveillance: a survey Reações adversas aos produtos cosméticos e o Sistema de Notificação em Vigilância Sanitária: um inquérito | 0 |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 30 | |
| 12 | 16 | |
| 13 | 29 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 101 | |
| 19 | 40 | |
| 20 | 29 |
About Gisele Huf
Gisele Huf is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 28 papers that have together received 481 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (11 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (7 papers) and Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (273 citations), Medical Terminology (3 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (178 citations). Gisele Huf has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Evandro Silva Freire Coutinho, Clive E Adams, Jacob Alexander, Michael H. Allen, Cláudia de Souza Lopes, Suely Rozenfeld, Afrânio Lineu Kritski, Luciana Branco da Motta, Adriana Cavalcanti de Aguiar and Kátia Vergetti Bloch. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Psychological Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.