Girma Wolde-Tsadik

1.7k citations
28 papers · 1.3k indexed · h-index 13

Girma Wolde-Tsadik

28 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Girma Wolde-Tsadik
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 459
  • Surgery 304
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 276
  • General Health Professions 256
  • Gastroenterology 188
Replace Laura Pizzi with:
Laura Pizzi United States
Amanda Henry Australia
Emma Tavender Australia
A. Grant United Kingdom
Hogne Sandvik Norway
Richard G. Roberts United States
Deanna K. Martin United States
Norma O’Flynn United Kingdom
Abdulla Al Sayyari Saudi Arabia
Nicole Mealing Australia
Girma Wolde-Tsadik relative to Laura Pizzi United States Laura Pizzi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×18.4×
Laura Pizzi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Girma Wolde-Tsadik

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Girma Wolde-Tsadik's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Girma Wolde-Tsadik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Girma Wolde-Tsadik more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Girma Wolde-Tsadik

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Girma Wolde-Tsadik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Girma Wolde-Tsadik. The network helps show where Girma Wolde-Tsadik may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Girma Wolde-Tsadik

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Girma Wolde-Tsadik. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Girma Wolde-Tsadik based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Girma Wolde-Tsadik. Girma Wolde-Tsadik is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 9
3 45
4 10
5 1
6 12
7 25
8 10
9
[Criteria of Rigiscan normalcy in aged men].
7
10 45
11 37
12 33
13 151
14 191
15 196
16
The urban church and cancer control: a source of social influence in minority communities.
130
17 237
18
Cancer rate differentials between blacks and whites of three metropolitan areas.
7
19 20
20 3

About Girma Wolde-Tsadik

Girma Wolde-Tsadik is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Statistics and Probability and Urology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (6 papers), Pelvic floor disorders treatments (3 papers) and Diabetes Management and Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (459 citations), Gastroenterology (188 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (125 citations). Girma Wolde-Tsadik has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Philippines. Frequent co-authors include George F. Longstreth, Yun‐Bao Liu, Bruce L. Flamm, David A. Sacks, Jeffrey S. Greenspoon, Janis F. Yao, Salim Abu-Fadil, Karl M. Luber, Gerald M. Borok and D Ershoff. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of the American Statistical Association and Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026