Edward W. Savage
- Epidemiology
- Oncology
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 10%
- Health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Lori A. CraneGerald S. BernsteinAnthony E. ReadingJonathan S. BerekJohn E. GunningAlfred C. MarcusCelia P. KaplanGirma Wolde-Tsadik
- Topics
- Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (10 papers)Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (3 papers)Uterine Myomas and Treatments (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Edward W. Savage
16 papers receiving 458 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Epidemiology 243
- Oncology 148
- General Health Professions 121
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 73
- Health 71
Countries citing papers authored by Edward W. Savage
This map shows the geographic impact of Edward W. Savage's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edward W. Savage with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edward W. Savage more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Edward W. Savage
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edward W. Savage. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edward W. Savage. The network helps show where Edward W. Savage may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edward W. Savage
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edward W. Savage. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edward W. Savage based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Edward W. Savage. Edward W. Savage is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Significance of a first-time atypical Papanicolaou smear in a young, high-risk African-American and Latino-American population. | 6 |
| 2 | The urban church and cancer control: a source of social influence in minority communities. | 130 |
| 3 | 174 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 15 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 29 | |
| 9 | 40 | |
| 10 | 34 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | Giant condyloma acuminatum of the endocervix and lower uterine segment. | 4 |
| 15 | Cervical deciduosis and intraepithelial neoplasia. | 7 |
| 16 | 17 |
About Edward W. Savage
Edward W. Savage is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Epidemiology and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 16 papers that have together received 489 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (10 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (3 papers) and Uterine Myomas and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (73 citations), Health (71 citations) and Epidemiology (243 citations). Edward W. Savage has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Lori A. Crane, Gerald S. Bernstein, Anthony E. Reading, Jonathan S. Berek, John E. Gunning, Alfred C. Marcus, Celia P. Kaplan, Girma Wolde-Tsadik, Lois C. Howland and Alcibíades Bustamante. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Care and Gynecologic Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.