Gin‐Den Chen

3.2k citations
115 papers · 2.4k indexed · h-index 31

Gin‐Den Chen

111 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

Gin‐Den Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 136
  • Urology 577
  • Rheumatology 757
  • Biological Psychiatry 67
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 72
  • Physiology 501
Replace Todd L. Edwards with:
Todd L. Edwards United States
Robert Wołk United States
Paola Nicoletti United States
Sherie A. Dowsett United States
Atsushi Imai Japan
Philippe Le Corvoisier France
Maple M. Fung United States
Aleksander Owczarek Poland
Makoto Daimon Japan
Ralph McGinnis United Kingdom
Gin‐Den Chen relative to Todd L. Edwards United States Todd L. Edwards's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15.2×
Todd L. Edwards · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gin‐Den Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gin‐Den Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gin‐Den Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gin‐Den Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gin‐Den Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gin‐Den Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gin‐Den Chen. The network helps show where Gin‐Den Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gin‐Den Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gin‐Den Chen Line = papers co-authored together Gin‐Den Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20211
2 201882
3 201714
4
ISP-36-5 Obliterative LeFort colpocleisis for pelvic organ prolapse in elderly women aged 70 years and over(Group 36 Women's Health 1,International Session Poster) :
20160
5 201533
6 201532
7 20144
8 20143
9 201339
10 201242
11 20104
12 200930
13 200823
14 200834
15 200717
16 200715
17 200646
18 200416
19 2003151
20 200216

About Gin‐Den Chen

Gin‐Den Chen is a scholar working on Urology, Rheumatology, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 115 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pelvic floor disorders treatments (47 papers), Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (39 papers), Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (22 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (22 papers), Urinary Tract Infections Management (14 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (8 papers), Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (7 papers) and Menstrual Health and Disorders (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (577 citations), Rheumatology (757 citations), Biological Psychiatry (67 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (72 citations) and Physiology (501 citations). Gin‐Den Chen has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Hsien‐Yu Peng, Long‐Yau Lin, Cheng‐Yuan Lai, Tzer-Bin Lin, Chi‐Chang Chang, Ming-Chun Hsieh, Tzu‐Li Lin, Soo‐Cheen Ng, Suh‐Woan Hu and Chi-Jie Lu. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology, International Urogynecology Journal, Pain, American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism and Journal of Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026