Gina Cranswick

509 total citations
5 papers, 124 citations indexed

About

Gina Cranswick is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Gina Cranswick has authored 5 papers receiving a total of 124 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Surgery, 2 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 1 paper in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Gina Cranswick's work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (2 papers), Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (1 paper) and Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (1 paper). Gina Cranswick is often cited by papers focused on Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (2 papers), Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (1 paper) and Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (1 paper). Gina Cranswick collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and Netherlands. Gina Cranswick's co-authors include Steven Lewis, Martin Dennis, J. Forbes, Basil Sharrack, Jeremy Chataway, Gavin Giovannoni, Catriona Keerie, Peter Connick, John Norrie and Polly Black and has published in prestigious journals such as Age and Ageing, BMJ Open and Health Technology Assessment.

In The Last Decade

Gina Cranswick

5 papers receiving 117 citations

Peers

Gina Cranswick
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • Speech and Hearing 59
  • Surgery 35
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 33
  • Physiology 29
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 27
Replace Lisa Ha with:
Lisa Ha Norway
Jacob Pacifico Netherlands
Li-Kuo Liu Taiwan
Gillian Turner United Kingdom
David Hargroves United Kingdom
Brendan Affley United Kingdom
Naoki Higashibeppu Japan
Hassan Soda Germany
Amy Fullerton United States
Katja Thomsen Denmark
Lisa Ha Norway View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Gina Cranswick
Gina Cranswick · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Gina Cranswick
Gina Cranswick · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Gina Cranswick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gina Cranswick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gina Cranswick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gina Cranswick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gina Cranswick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gina Cranswick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gina Cranswick. The network helps show where Gina Cranswick may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gina Cranswick

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gina Cranswick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gina Cranswick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gina Cranswick. Gina Cranswick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

5 of 5 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 6
2
Optical coherence tomography in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: a baseline data report from the MS-SMART trial
2
3
MS-SMART trial design and recruitment status: a multi-arm phase IIB randomised double blind placebo-controlled clinical trial comparing the efficacy of three repositioned neuroprotective drugs in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis
1
4 1
5 114

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026