Gill Main

1.0k total citations
26 papers, 580 citations indexed

About

Gill Main is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Gill Main has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 580 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 8 papers in Social Psychology and 8 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Gill Main's work include Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (8 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (6 papers) and Homelessness and Social Issues (6 papers). Gill Main is often cited by papers focused on Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (8 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (6 papers) and Homelessness and Social Issues (6 papers). Gill Main collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, South Korea and United States. Gill Main's co-authors include Jonathan Bradshaw, Jose Marquez, Tamar Dinisman, Kangan Li, Guglielmo Scovazzi, Carme Montserrat, Sabine Andresen, Bong Joo Lee, Yekaterina Chzhen and Christine Skinner and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Marriage and the Family, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering and Journal of Adolescent Health.

In The Last Decade

Gill Main

26 papers receiving 554 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Gill Main United Kingdom 14 263 209 162 152 105 26 580
Yoonsun Han South Korea 13 312 1.2× 256 1.2× 101 0.6× 262 1.7× 65 0.6× 63 685
Shandra S. Forrest-Bank United States 13 168 0.6× 216 1.0× 156 1.0× 243 1.6× 90 0.9× 24 496
Mark S. Aber United States 12 149 0.6× 207 1.0× 277 1.7× 228 1.5× 93 0.9× 21 657
Jorge J. Varela Chile 17 495 1.9× 123 0.6× 279 1.7× 276 1.8× 148 1.4× 68 738
Antonio J. Rodríguez‐Hidalgo Spain 13 422 1.6× 141 0.7× 232 1.4× 348 2.3× 56 0.5× 29 732
Marta Malinowska-Cieślik Poland 9 246 0.9× 170 0.8× 181 1.1× 105 0.7× 58 0.6× 26 477
Luz E. Robinson United States 12 300 1.1× 106 0.5× 191 1.2× 230 1.5× 56 0.5× 34 531
Amapola Povedano Spain 9 226 0.9× 80 0.4× 120 0.7× 147 1.0× 50 0.5× 31 380
Cristina Figuer Spain 13 405 1.5× 136 0.7× 172 1.1× 192 1.3× 58 0.6× 24 592
Betty Yung United States 10 177 0.7× 133 0.6× 73 0.5× 246 1.6× 76 0.7× 18 509

Countries citing papers authored by Gill Main

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gill Main's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gill Main with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gill Main more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gill Main

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gill Main. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gill Main. The network helps show where Gill Main may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gill Main

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gill Main. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gill Main based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gill Main. Gill Main is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Main, Gill, et al.. (2023). Law 11.947/2009. The National School Food Program Reviseted. Direito Público. 19(104). 1 indexed citations
2.
Redmond, Gerry, Gill Main, Alexander W. O’Donnell, et al.. (2022). Who excludes? Young People’s Experience of Social Exclusion. Journal of Social Policy. 53(1). 236–259. 9 indexed citations
3.
Main, Gill, et al.. (2021). Needs or Wants? Children and Parents Understanding and Negotiating Needs and Necessities. 4(1-3). 13–36. 3 indexed citations
4.
Mansfield, M. Robert, et al.. (2020). A Different Take: Reflections on an intergenerational participatory research project on child poverty. Social work & society. 18(3). 3 indexed citations
5.
Weinberg, Dominic, Gonneke W. J. M. Stevens, Candace Currie, et al.. (2020). Country-Level Meritocratic Beliefs Moderate the Social Gradient in Adolescent Mental Health: A Multilevel Study in 30 European Countries. Journal of Adolescent Health. 68(3). 548–557. 14 indexed citations
6.
Main, Gill. (2018). Fair Shares and Families: a Child-Focused Model of Intra-Household Sharing. 1(1-3). 31–49. 7 indexed citations
7.
Main, Gill. (2017). Child poverty and subjective well-being: The impact of children's perceptions of fairness and involvement in intra-household sharing. Children and Youth Services Review. 97. 49–58. 17 indexed citations
8.
Main, Gill, Carme Montserrat, Sabine Andresen, Jonathan Bradshaw, & Bong Joo Lee. (2017). Inequality, material well-being, and subjective well-being: Exploring associations for children across 15 diverse countries. Children and Youth Services Review. 97. 3–13. 41 indexed citations
9.
Main, Gill, et al.. (2016). Comparing Child Subjective Well-Being in South Korea and the UK: Testing an Ecological Systems Approach. Child Indicators Research. 10(1). 19–32. 16 indexed citations
10.
Main, Gill & Jonathan Bradshaw. (2015). Child poverty in the UK: Measures, prevalence and intra-household sharing. Critical Social Policy. 36(1). 38–61. 42 indexed citations
11.
Dinisman, Tamar, et al.. (2015). Findings from the First Wave of the ISCWeB Project: International Perspectives on Child Subjective Well-Being. Child Indicators Research. 8(1). 1–4. 41 indexed citations
12.
Nandy, Shailen & Gill Main. (2015). The consensual approach to child poverty measurement. ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University). 9 indexed citations
13.
Bradshaw, Jonathan & Gill Main. (2014). How many working poor parents might be able to work more. White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York). 1 indexed citations
14.
Main, Gill. (2014). Child Poverty and Children’s Subjective Well-Being. Child Indicators Research. 7(3). 451–472. 53 indexed citations
15.
Main, Gill & Jonathan Bradshaw. (2014). Children's necessities: trends over time in perceptions and ownership. Journal of Poverty and Social Justice. 22(3). 193–208. 19 indexed citations
16.
Skinner, Christine & Gill Main. (2013). The contribution of child maintenance payments to the income packages of lone mothers. Journal of Poverty and Social Justice. 21(1). 47–60. 12 indexed citations
17.
Braund, Martin, Judith Bennett, Gill Main, & Gillian Hampden‐Thompson. (2013). Teaching approach and success in A-level Biology. 1 indexed citations
18.
Braund, Martin, Judith Bennett, Gillian Hampden‐Thompson, & Gill Main. (2013). Teaching approach and success in A-level biology: comparing student attainment in context-based, concept-based and mixed approaches to teaching A-level biology. Report to the Nuffield Foundation. York: Department of Education, University of York. Durham Research Online (Durham University). 2 indexed citations
19.
Main, Gill & Jonathan Bradshaw. (2012). A Child Material Deprivation Index. Child Indicators Research. 5(3). 503–521. 99 indexed citations
20.
Bradshaw, Jonathan & Gill Main. (2010). PSE Measures Review Paper: Children's Deprivation Items. White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York). 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026