Giles Scott‐Smith

1.2k citations
71 papers · 376 indexed · h-index 11

Giles Scott‐Smith

54 papers receiving 290 citations

Peers

Giles Scott‐Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Political Science and International Relations 214
  • Sociology and Political Science 184
  • History 100
  • Communication 43
  • History and Philosophy of Science 40
Replace Robert Dallek with:
Robert Dallek United States
Frank Costigliola United States
Péter Kenéz United States
George C. Herring United States
Michael H. Hunt United States
Odd Arne Westad United States
Peter S. Onuf United States
Rhodri Jeffreys‐Jones United Kingdom
James Raven United Kingdom
Halvard Leira Norway
Giles Scott‐Smith relative to Robert Dallek United States Robert Dallek's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12×
Robert Dallek · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Giles Scott‐Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Giles Scott‐Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Giles Scott‐Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Giles Scott‐Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Giles Scott‐Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Giles Scott‐Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Giles Scott‐Smith. The network helps show where Giles Scott‐Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Giles Scott‐Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Giles Scott‐Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Giles Scott‐Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Giles Scott‐Smith. Giles Scott‐Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 0
3 1
4 1
5 1
6
Unhinging the National Framework. Perspectives on Transnational Life Writing
1
7 2
8 0
9 2
10 12
11 2
12 12
13 2
14 2
15 2
16 6
17 4
18 7
19 1
20
The politics of apolitical culture : the congress for cultural freedom, the CIA and post-war American hegemony
66

About Giles Scott‐Smith

Giles Scott‐Smith is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, History and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 71 papers that have together received 376 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics (14 papers), Communism, Protests, Social Movements (10 papers) and Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (100 citations), Political Science and International Relations (214 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (40 citations). Giles Scott‐Smith has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Kiran Klaus Patel, Moritz Baumgärtel, Frédéric Bozo, Luk Van Langenhove, Idesbald Goddeeris, Michael J. Hogan, Simon Schunz, Antonio Varsori, N. Piers Ludlow and Philipp Gassert. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of American History, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science and Technology and Culture.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026