Giles Scott‐Smith

1.2k citations
71 papers · 376 indexed · h-index 11

Giles Scott‐Smith

54 papers receiving 290 citations

Peers

Giles Scott‐Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • History 100
  • Political Science and International Relations 214
  • History and Philosophy of Science 40
  • Communication 43
  • Sociology and Political Science 184
Replace Robert Dallek with:
Robert Dallek United States
Frank Costigliola United States
Péter Kenéz United States
George C. Herring United States
Michael H. Hunt United States
Odd Arne Westad United States
Peter S. Onuf United States
Rhodri Jeffreys‐Jones United Kingdom
James Raven United Kingdom
Halvard Leira Norway
Giles Scott‐Smith relative to Robert Dallek United States Robert Dallek's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12×
Robert Dallek · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Giles Scott‐Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Giles Scott‐Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Giles Scott‐Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Giles Scott‐Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Giles Scott‐Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Giles Scott‐Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Giles Scott‐Smith. The network helps show where Giles Scott‐Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Giles Scott‐Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Giles Scott‐Smith Line = papers co-authored together Giles Scott‐Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20240
2 20230
3 20231
4 20221
5 20211
6
Unhinging the National Framework. Perspectives on Transnational Life Writing
20201
7 20172
8 20170
9 20142
10 201412
11 20142
12 201312
13 20132
14 20102
15 20082
16 20066
17 20044
18 20037
19 20031
20
The politics of apolitical culture : the congress for cultural freedom, the CIA and post-war American hegemony
200266

About Giles Scott‐Smith

Giles Scott‐Smith is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, History and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 71 papers that have together received 376 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics (14 papers), Communism, Protests, Social Movements (10 papers), Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (8 papers), European history and politics (7 papers), International Relations and Foreign Policy (7 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (4 papers), Historical Influence and Diplomacy (4 papers) and Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (100 citations), Political Science and International Relations (214 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (40 citations). Giles Scott‐Smith has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Kiran Klaus Patel, Moritz Baumgärtel, Frédéric Bozo, Luk Van Langenhove, Idesbald Goddeeris, Michael J. Hogan, Simon Schunz, Antonio Varsori, N. Piers Ludlow and Philipp Gassert. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of American History, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science and Technology and Culture.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026