Gilberto Gomes
Impact in
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Free Will and Agency
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Neural dynamics and brain function
- EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Papers in
-
- Free Will and Agency 4
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 5
- Co-authors
- Miguel Correia (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Consciousness and Cognition (3 papers)Erkenntnis (1 paper)Journal of Consciousness Studies (1 paper)Analysis (1 paper)Journal of Philosophical Logic (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- BrazilUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Gilberto Gomes
25 papers receiving 173 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Cognitive Neuroscience 107
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 42
- Philosophy 27
- History and Philosophy of Science 10
- General Decision Sciences 3
Countries citing papers authored by Gilberto Gomes
This map shows the geographic impact of Gilberto Gomes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gilberto Gomes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gilberto Gomes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gilberto Gomes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gilberto Gomes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gilberto Gomes. The network helps show where Gilberto Gomes may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 1 scholars most cited alongside Gilberto Gomes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1998 | 57 | |
| 2 | Volition and the readiness potential | 1999 | 21 |
| 3 | 2002 | 19 | |
| 4 | 2008 | 15 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 11 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 9 | |
| 9 | 1995 | 6 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2005 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2001 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2003 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2006 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2005 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2013 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2011 | 2 | |
| 20 | Meaning-preserving contraposition of conditionals | 2019 | 2 |
About Gilberto Gomes
Gilberto Gomes is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, Clinical Psychology and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 26 papers that have together received 199 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research (5 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (5 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (5 papers), Psychology and Mental Health (5 papers), Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (5 papers), Free Will and Agency (4 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (4 papers) and Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (107 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (42 citations), Philosophy (27 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (10 citations) and General Decision Sciences (3 citations). Gilberto Gomes has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Miguel Correia. Their work appears in journals such as Consciousness and Cognition, Erkenntnis, Journal of Consciousness Studies, Analysis and Journal of Philosophical Logic.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.