G.F. Leatham
Impact in
- Biotechnology top 5%
- Microbial Metabolism and Applications
- Plant Science top 10%
- Enzyme-mediated dye degradation
- Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Papers in
-
- Fungal Biology and Applications 6
-
- Enzyme-mediated dye degradation 5
- Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions 3
- Co-authors
- Mark A. StahmannGary C. MyersTheodore H. WegnerDavid A. WoodRobert A. BlanchetteT. Kent KirkThomas W. JeffriesRichard R. Burgess
- Journals
- TAPPI Journal (4 papers)Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (2 papers)Journal of Food Biochemistry (1 paper)Microbiology (1 paper)FEMS Microbiology Letters (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesRussia
In The Last Decade
G.F. Leatham
11 papers receiving 365 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Biotechnology 113
- Plant Science 334
- Pharmacology 144
- Insect Science 63
- Cell Biology 45
Countries citing papers authored by G.F. Leatham
This map shows the geographic impact of G.F. Leatham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G.F. Leatham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G.F. Leatham more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by G.F. Leatham
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G.F. Leatham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G.F. Leatham. The network helps show where G.F. Leatham may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 9 scholars most cited alongside G.F. Leatham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1992 | 87 | |
| 2 | Biological treatments as an alternative to chemical pretreatments in high-yield wood pulping | 1991 | 7 |
| 3 | Biomechanical pulping of aspen chips: paper strength and optical properties resulting from different fungal treatments | 1990 | 26 |
| 4 | Biomechanical pulping of aspen chips: energy savings resulting from different fungal treatments | 1990 | 33 |
| 5 | 1990 | 23 | |
| 6 | 1984 | 17 | |
| 7 | 1984 | 3 | |
| 8 | 1983 | 14 | |
| 9 | Biotechnology: Applications and Implications for the Pulp and Paper Industry | 1983 | 18 |
| 10 | 1983 | 33 | |
| 11 | 1981 | 160 |
About G.F. Leatham
G.F. Leatham is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Plant Science, Biotechnology, Biomedical Engineering and Food Science, having authored 11 papers that have together received 421 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fungal Biology and Applications (6 papers), Enzyme-mediated dye degradation (5 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (3 papers), Lignin and Wood Chemistry (2 papers), Biofuel production and bioconversion (2 papers), Forest Biomass Utilization and Management (2 papers), Biocrusts and Microbial Ecology (1 paper) and Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (113 citations), Plant Science (334 citations), Pharmacology (144 citations), Insect Science (63 citations) and Cell Biology (45 citations). G.F. Leatham has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Mark A. Stahmann, Gary C. Myers, Theodore H. Wegner, David A. Wood, Robert A. Blanchette, T. Kent Kirk, Thomas W. Jeffries, Richard R. Burgess and Chittra Mishra. Their work appears in journals such as TAPPI Journal, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Journal of Food Biochemistry, Microbiology and FEMS Microbiology Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.