Gesche Ketels
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Rehabilitation top 2%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Neurology top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Co-authors
- Stefan M. GoldStefan PatraChristoph HeesenBernd LöweChristian BrünahlEik VettorazziAnne BarzelSchulz Kh
- Topics
- Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (7 papers)Pregnancy-related medical research (6 papers)Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (6 papers)
In The Last Decade
Gesche Ketels
31 papers receiving 679 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 201
- Rehabilitation 197
- Psychiatry and Mental health 173
- Neurology 143
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 104
Countries citing papers authored by Gesche Ketels
This map shows the geographic impact of Gesche Ketels's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gesche Ketels with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gesche Ketels more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gesche Ketels
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gesche Ketels. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gesche Ketels. The network helps show where Gesche Ketels may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gesche Ketels
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gesche Ketels. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gesche Ketels based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gesche Ketels. Gesche Ketels is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 30 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 19 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 28 | |
| 9 | 14 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 93 | |
| 14 | 63 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 55 | |
| 17 | 20 | |
| 18 | Erste deutschlandweite Befragung von Physio- und Ergotherapeuten zur Berufssituation - Teil 1: Profil der Teilnehmer (Basisdaten) | 3 |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 41 |
About Gesche Ketels
Gesche Ketels is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Complementary and Manual Therapy and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, having authored 32 papers that have together received 702 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (7 papers), Pregnancy-related medical research (6 papers) and Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (197 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (173 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (201 citations). Gesche Ketels has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Sweden and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Stefan M. Gold, Stefan Patra, Christoph Heesen, Bernd Löwe, Christian Brünahl, Eik Vettorazzi, Anne Barzel, Schulz Kh, Alexander Tallner and Hendrik van den Bussche. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet Neurology, Journal of Psychosomatic Research and BMJ Open.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.