Gert ten Hoopen

682 total citations
37 papers, 508 citations indexed

About

Gert ten Hoopen is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. According to data from OpenAlex, Gert ten Hoopen has authored 37 papers receiving a total of 508 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 31 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 21 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 4 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Recurrent topics in Gert ten Hoopen's work include Neuroscience and Music Perception (22 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (19 papers) and Multisensory perception and integration (18 papers). Gert ten Hoopen is often cited by papers focused on Neuroscience and Music Perception (22 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (19 papers) and Multisensory perception and integration (18 papers). Gert ten Hoopen collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Japan and Italy. Gert ten Hoopen's co-authors include Yoshitaka Nakajima, Takayuki Sasaki, Joos Vos, Simone Akerboom, Robert J. Hartsuiker, Masako Tanaka, Giulio E. Lancioni, Gerard B. Remijn, Katsuyuki Yamamoto and Leo Boelaarts and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance, Acta Psychologica and Perception.

In The Last Decade

Gert ten Hoopen

36 papers receiving 478 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Gert ten Hoopen Netherlands 14 471 289 75 31 23 37 508
Marie-Claire Botte France 13 529 1.1× 187 0.6× 98 1.3× 41 1.3× 12 0.5× 28 571
Caroline B. Monahan United States 6 314 0.7× 96 0.3× 162 2.2× 45 1.5× 8 0.3× 9 328
Miia Seppänen Finland 8 408 0.9× 122 0.4× 89 1.2× 86 2.8× 17 0.7× 9 417
Isabelle Peretz Canada 8 435 0.9× 158 0.5× 124 1.7× 128 4.1× 20 0.9× 12 488
Trevor Henthorn United States 11 538 1.1× 315 1.1× 189 2.5× 106 3.4× 30 1.3× 21 671
Philippe Lalitte France 12 463 1.0× 152 0.5× 113 1.5× 100 3.2× 17 0.7× 30 498
D. Timothy Ives United Kingdom 9 332 0.7× 136 0.5× 98 1.3× 5 0.2× 5 0.2× 14 397
Lauren V. Hadley United Kingdom 11 225 0.5× 123 0.4× 32 0.4× 14 0.5× 9 0.4× 28 331
Laura-Lee Balkwill Canada 5 257 0.5× 73 0.3× 83 1.1× 118 3.8× 10 0.4× 8 282
Dominique T. Vuvan Canada 13 543 1.2× 197 0.7× 122 1.6× 146 4.7× 24 1.0× 29 588

Countries citing papers authored by Gert ten Hoopen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gert ten Hoopen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gert ten Hoopen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gert ten Hoopen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gert ten Hoopen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gert ten Hoopen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gert ten Hoopen. The network helps show where Gert ten Hoopen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gert ten Hoopen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gert ten Hoopen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gert ten Hoopen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gert ten Hoopen. Gert ten Hoopen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hoopen, Gert ten, et al.. (2011). Multiple-look effects on temporal discrimination within sound sequences. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 73(7). 2249–2269. 17 indexed citations
2.
Sasaki, Takayuki, et al.. (2010). Time stretching: Illusory lengthening of filled auditory durations. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 72(5). 1404–1421. 10 indexed citations
3.
Hoopen, Gert ten, et al.. (2004). Multiple Looks on Temporal Discrimination in Sound Sequences. 34(10). 693–700. 1 indexed citations
4.
Sasaki, Takayuki, et al.. (2002). Time-shrinking, its propagation, and Gestalt principles. Perception & Psychophysics. 64(6). 919–931. 25 indexed citations
5.
Nakajima, Yoshitaka, et al.. (2000). Illusory recouplings of onsets and terminations of glide tone components. Perception & Psychophysics. 62(7). 1413–1425. 22 indexed citations
6.
Lancioni, Giulio E., D. Oliva, & Gert ten Hoopen. (1997). Spoken Messages as Auditory Cues for Orientation in Promoting Indoor Travel and Activity by Persons with Multiple Disabilities. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 85(2). 403–410. 7 indexed citations
7.
Lancioni, Giulio E., et al.. (1997). Reducing excessive vocal loudness in persons with mental retardation through the use of a portable auditory-feedback device. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry. 28(2). 123–128. 8 indexed citations
8.
Lancioni, Giulio E., et al.. (1996). Use of An Acoustic Orientation System for Indoor Travel with a Spatially Disabled Blind Man. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness. 90(1). 36–42. 7 indexed citations
9.
Hoopen, Gert ten, et al.. (1994). The detection of anisochrony in monaural and interaural sound sequences. Perception & Psychophysics. 56(1). 110–120. 29 indexed citations
10.
Hoopen, Gert ten, et al.. (1993). A New Illusion of Time Perception—II. Music Perception An Interdisciplinary Journal. 11(1). 15–38. 20 indexed citations
11.
Nakajima, Yoshitaka, et al.. (1992). Time-shrinking: A discontinuity in the perception of auditory temporal patterns. Perception & Psychophysics. 51(5). 504–507. 44 indexed citations
12.
Akerboom, Simone, et al.. (1985). Does the octave illusion evoke the interaural tempo illusion?. Perception & Psychophysics. 38(3). 281–285. 8 indexed citations
13.
Hoopen, Gert ten, et al.. (1982). Vibrotactual choice reaction time, tactile receptor systems and ideomotor compatibility. Acta Psychologica. 50(2). 143–157. 18 indexed citations
14.
Hoopen, Gert ten, et al.. (1982). Interaural and monaural clicks and clocks: Tempo difference versus attention switching.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 8(3). 422–434. 4 indexed citations
15.
Hoopen, Gert ten, et al.. (1982). The perceived tempi of coherent and streaming tone sequences. Perception & Psychophysics. 31(3). 256–260. 4 indexed citations
16.
Hoopen, Gert ten & Joos Vos. (1981). Attention switching and patterns of sound locations in counting clicks.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 7(2). 342–355. 4 indexed citations
17.
Hoopen, Gert ten & Joos Vos. (1981). Attention switching and patterns of sound locations in counting clicks.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 7(2). 342–355. 8 indexed citations
18.
Hoopen, Gert ten & Joos Vos. (1980). Attention switching is not a fatigable process: Methodological comments on Axelrod and Guzy (1972).. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 6(1). 180–183. 9 indexed citations
19.
Hoopen, Gert ten & Joos Vos. (1979). Effect on numerosity judgment of grouping of tones by auditory channels. Perception & Psychophysics. 26(5). 374–380. 22 indexed citations
20.
Galen, Gerard P. van & Gert ten Hoopen. (1976). Speech control and single channelness. Acta Psychologica. 40(3). 245–255. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026